The mxml-manifest in a FlexJS SDK is empty because FB/Falcon didn’t seem to care. If IJ is counting on it containing certain things we can certainly provide one. But it might also scan the frameworks folder looking for -manifest.xml files.
Thanks, -Alex On 5/28/15, 6:09 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces, >> therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme >> pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a >> different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag. > >Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that it has its own rule to >write its config.xml, the only way I guess would be a plugin to override >its behaviour. > >> And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. > >I can try that > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000 >> >> Hi Fred, >> >> Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces, >> therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme >> pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a >> different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag. >> >> I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the SDK folder will convince >> IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest into mxml-manifest. >> >> And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. >> >> Thanks for digging into this, >> -Alex >> >> On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Actually, it is more complicated. >> > >> >This is what it is generated by IJ: >> > >> >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d >> > >> >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one overrides >> >the one of IJ apparently >> > >> >it results: >> > >> >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 errors and >>11 >> >warnings >> >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml >> >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >> >MyModel. >> >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not >> >be found. >> >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could not be resolved to an >> >ActionScript class. It will be ignored. >> >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml >> >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not >> >be found. >> >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >> >MyModel. >> >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >> >MyModel. >> >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'. >> >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'responseText'. >> >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'strings'. >> >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >> >detect assignments to 'allData'. >> >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController.a >>>s >> >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not >> >be found. >> >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >> >MyModel. >> >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >> >MyModel. >> >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >> >MyModel. >> > >> >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc : >> > >> >>>-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\flex- >>>co >> >nfig.xml" >> >>>-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest.sw >>>f >> >>>-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest.sw >>>c >> >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml >> > >> >It builds. >> > >> >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the framework, it results in >> >compilation error because it can't find mxml-2009-manifest.xml neither >> >the bundle resources, actually, the locale folder in my FlexJS SDK is >> >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my Flex SDK, the compilation >> >fails because the >> >it can't find the components from the >> >>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spark. >>>cs >> >s >> > >> >Frédéric THOMAS >> > >> >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100 >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to compile swc and js >> >>files from IntelliJ. >> >> >> >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to have things >> >>green though, also, despite, it passes a correct config.xml, the MXMLC >> >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib (the class is in the lib and >> >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with both include path and >>external >> >>and had the same result), did someone already tried this kind of >>config ? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100 >> >> > >> >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does >>it >> >>get >> >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use a modified >> >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change >>getCompilerConfiguration >> >>to >> >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and >>store >> >>the >> >> > > config someplace. >> >> > >> >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config and still >>make >> >>IJ happy. >> >> > >> >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these >> >>things in >> >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library >>within a >> >> > > regular Flex SDK? >> >> > >> >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into either, we still >> >>need to add the FlexJS Lib + FlexJS SDK >> >> > >> >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> >> > >> >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000 >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> >>wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you look at >> >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe there is code >>in >> >>there >> >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, then >>populates >> >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config. >> >> > > > >> >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a legacy >> >>Configuration >> >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, IFAIK, I can't >>use >> >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly. >> >> > > >> >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does >>it >> >>get >> >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use a modified >> >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change >>getCompilerConfiguration >> >>to >> >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and >>store >> >>the >> >> > > config someplace. >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile from >>IntelliJ >> >>to .swf >> >> > > >/ .js >> >> > > >> >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these >> >>things in >> >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library >>within a >> >> > > regular Flex SDK? >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it build with Ant >> >>tonight >> >> > > >though, I'll keep you in touch. >> >> > > >> >> > > Hey, this is great progress. I’m going to be a while on the FDB >>for >> >> > > Falcon so no hurry. >> >> > > >> >> > > -Alex >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >
