> If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does it get
> used or does IJ have its own version?  If you can use a modified
> Configuration, you might be able to change getCompilerConfiguration to
> call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and store the
> config someplace.

Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config and still make IJ happy.

> Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these things in
> IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library within a
> regular Flex SDK?

For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into either, we still need to add 
the FlexJS Lib  + FlexJS SDK

Frédéric THOMAS

> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you look at
> >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe there is code in there
> >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, then populates
> >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config.
> >
> >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a legacy Configuration
> >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, IFAIK, I can't use
> >OEMUtil to give it directly.
> 
> If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does it get
> used or does IJ have its own version?  If you can use a modified
> Configuration, you might be able to change getCompilerConfiguration to
> call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and store the
> config someplace.
> 
> >
> >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile from IntelliJ to .swf
> >/ .js
> 
> Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these things in
> IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library within a
> regular Flex SDK?
> 
> >
> >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it build with Ant tonight
> >though, I'll keep you in touch.
> 
> Hey, this is great progress.  I’m going to be a while on the FDB for
> Falcon so no hurry.
> 
> -Alex                           
> 
                                          

Reply via email to