Hi Alex, Are you saying the AS3DebuggerReducer doesn't work ?
Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 18:09:10 +0000 > > OK, I’m still working out the kinks of FDB calling Falcon to evaluate > expressions. That’s in the BURM code so who knows how long that will take. > > -Alex > > On 5/29/15, 10:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Hi Alex, > > > >I spent some time checking if it is was possible to let the minimum of > >classes to make IJ happy, it turns out that or at least seems to be the > >minimum already. > >The only thing I committed and not yet pushed is the factorisation of the > >fixArg function, it was on my way and I don't like duplicated, confusing > >or even not used code :-) > > > >So, I guess I will do a push by tomorrow, feel free to review / fix / > >rebase on it for FDB > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:51:10 +0100 > >> > >> Ah yes, you make me think I didn't stub the things I could have > >>probably avoid some classes from the swfutils, will do that in the week > >>end > >> > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:48:43 +0100 > >> > > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a > >>few days > >> > > ago and it looked reasonable. > >> > > >> > Thanks for that but I pushed force my branch changing some code (in > >>better I hope) and the build too. > >> > > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular > >>Flex SDK > >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own? > >> > > >> > Yes, the swfutils.jar but I've seen something in the build.xml that > >>didn't work for me, it was a copy of the required classes to > >>falcon/swfutils, maybe you can fix that along with your FDB work as If > >>IIUC, you was about to do it for FDB ? > >> > > >> > Aso, the user still has to add the FlexJS lib as dependency in IJ > >>otherwise everything is red. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:39:58 +0000 > >> > > > >> > > Awesome! I hope to finish up FDB this week and then work on > >>packaging. > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a > >>few days > >> > > ago and it looked reasonable. > >> > > > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular > >>Flex SDK > >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own? > >> > > > >> > > -Alex > >> > > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 11:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >Almost the end. > >> > > > > >> > > >So, to come back on this, at the moment with my current > >>implementation, > >> > > >we can compile Applications and Libraries and link them together > >> > > >overriding the IntelliJ configuration as show here > >> > > >http://snag.gy/5SzuG.jpg the second build configuarion suffixed by > >>_JS > >> > > >guess what, is to compile to JS, to create it, it's enough to copy > >>the > >> > > >first build configuration and add the -js-output-type to any of the > >> > > >current valid output type. > >> > > > > >> > > >Not perfect and not what I was hoping but still, that's much more > >>better > >> > > >than using external tools and it is per build configuration, not > >>one for > >> > > >all of your projects. > >> > > > > >> > > >A better integration could happen if I find time to code an > >>IntelliJ > >> > > >plugin for FlexJS though, let see first how it will be adopted, the > >> > > >current integration seems still pretty descent. > >> > > > > >> > > >So, I would like better compiler expert to review my code as it > >>was my > >> > > >first compiler contribution, the branch is IDEA_JS_COMPILER > >>(sorry, I > >> > > >forgot to prefix with ticket ID) > >> > > > > >> > > >Maybe it would be opportune to create a binary kit for people > >>would want > >> > > >to test it and return feedback, maybe we can also wait for the > >>Alex work > >> > > >about FDB and see how to deal better with swfutils.jar as at the > >>moment > >> > > >I'm using the one of the Flex SDK. > >> > > > > >> > > >thought ? > >> > > > > >> > > >Thanks, > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:41:03 +0100 > >> > > >> > >> > > >> The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-) > >> > > >> > >> > > >> If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes because it > >>can't > >> > > >>find IStateClient2 > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > >> > > >> [1] > >> > > >> Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException at > >> > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73) > >> > > >> at > >> > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeNodeStream.nextElement(CommonTreeNodeS > >>>>tr > >> > > >>eam.java:104) at > >> > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.fill(LookaheadStream.java:113) > >> > > >> at > >> > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.syncAhead(LookaheadStream.java:1 > >>>>07 > >> > > >>) at > >> > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.LT(LookaheadStream.java:129) > >> > > >>at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSTree.stylesheet(CSSTree.java:2 > >>>>00 > >> > > >>) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSDocument.parse(CSSDocument.jav > >>>>a: > >> > > >>81) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache$CSSDocumentCa > >>>>ch > >> > > >>eKey2.parse(CSSDocumentCache.java:280) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa > >>>>lu > >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:323) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa > >>>>lu > >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:54) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.get(C > >>>>on > >> > > >>currentCacheStoreBase.java:69) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSManager.getCSSFromThemes(CSSMa > >>>>na > >> > > >>ger.java:251) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.collectTheme > >>>>s( > >> > > >>FlexAppSWFTarget.java:553) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.findAllCompi > >>>>la > >> > > >>tionUnitsToLink(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:493) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.buildAllCompilationUni > >>>>ts > >> > > >>(Target.java:297) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.getBuiltCompilationUni > >>>>tS > >> > > >>et(Target.java:306) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.SWFTarget.build(SWFTarget.jav > >>>>a: > >> > > >>228) at > >> > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildSWFModel(MXMLC.java:760) > >> > > >> at > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildArtifact(MXMLC.java:746) > >> > > >> at > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:625) > >> > > >> at > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:611) > >> > > >> at > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:230) > >> > > >> at > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:198) > >> > > >> at > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.execute(MXMLC.java:185) > >> > > >> at flex2.tools.Tool.compile(Tool.java:62) at > >> > > >>flex2.tools.Mxmlc.mxmlc(Mxmlc.java:72) at > >> > > > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.flex4.Flex4Handler.compileSwf(Flex4Handler.j > >>>>av > >> > > >>a:81) at > >> > > > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.CompilationThread.run(CompilationThread.java > >>>>:4 > >> > > >>8) > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:29 +0100 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of > >> > > >>namespaces, > >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had > >>a theme > >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK > >>has a > >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme > >>tag. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that it has its own > >>rule > >> > > >>to write its config.xml, the only way I guess would be a plugin to > >> > > >>override its behaviour. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I can try that > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000 > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Hi Fred, > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of > >> > > >>namespaces, > >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had > >>a theme > >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK > >>has a > >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme > >>tag. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the SDK folder > >>will > >> > > >>convince > >> > > >> > > IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest into > >> > > >>mxml-manifest. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Thanks for digging into this, > >> > > >> > > -Alex > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> > > >>wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >Actually, it is more complicated. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >This is what it is generated by IJ: > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one > >> > > >>overrides > >> > > >> > > >the one of IJ apparently > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >it results: > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 > >>errors > >> > > >>and 11 > >> > > >> > > >warnings > >> > > >> > > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml > >> > > >> > > >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > >>undefined > >> > > >>method > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition > >>models.MyModel > >> > > >>could not > >> > > >> > > >be found. > >> > > >> > > >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could not be > >>resolved to > >> > > >>an > >> > > >> > > >ActionScript class. It will be ignored. > >> > > >> > > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition > >>models.MyModel > >> > > >>could not > >> > > >> > > >be found. > >> > > >> > > >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > >>undefined > >> > > >>method > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > >> > > >> > > >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > >>undefined > >> > > >>method > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'responseText'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'strings'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > >>be able > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'allData'. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController > >>>>>.a > >> > > >>>s > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition > >>models.MyModel > >> > > >>could not > >> > > >> > > >be found. > >> > > >> > > >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > >>undefined > >> > > >>method > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > >> > > >> > > >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > >>undefined > >> > > >>method > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > >> > > >> > > >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > >>undefined > >> > > >>method > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc : > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\fle > >>>>>x- > >> > > >>>co > >> > > >> > > >nfig.xml" > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest. > >>>>>sw > >> > > >>>f > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest. > >>>>>sw > >> > > >>>c > >> > > >> > > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >It builds. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the framework, it > >>results > >> > > >>in > >> > > >> > > >compilation error because it can't find > >>mxml-2009-manifest.xml > >> > > >>neither > >> > > >> > > >the bundle resources, actually, the locale folder in my > >>FlexJS SDK > >> > > >>is > >> > > >> > > >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my Flex SDK, the > >> > > >>compilation > >> > > >> > > >fails because the > >> > > >> > > >it can't find the components from the > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spar > >>>>>k. > >> > > >>>cs > >> > > >> > > >s > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100 > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> Hi, > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to > >>compile swc > >> > > >>and js > >> > > >> > > >>files from IntelliJ. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to > >>have > >> > > >>things > >> > > >> > > >>green though, also, despite, it passes a correct > >>config.xml, the > >> > > >>MXMLC > >> > > >> > > >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib (the class is in > >>the > >> > > >>lib and > >> > > >> > > >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with both include path > >>and > >> > > >>external > >> > > >> > > >>and had the same result), did someone already tried this > >>kind of > >> > > >>config ? > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > >> > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >> > > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > >> > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in > >>flex-oem-compiler > >> > > >>does it > >> > > >> > > >>get > >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use > >>a > >> > > >>modified > >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change > >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration > >> > > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call > >>OEMUtil > >> > > >>and store > >> > > >> > > >>the > >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config > >>and > >> > > >>still make > >> > > >> > > >>IJ happy. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK > >>can do > >> > > >>these > >> > > >> > > >>things in > >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a > >>library > >> > > >>within a > >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into > >>either, we > >> > > >>still > >> > > >> > > >>need to add the FlexJS Lib + FlexJS SDK > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > >> > > >> > > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000 > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > >> > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > >> > > >> > > >>wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you > >>look at > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe > >>there is > >> > > >>code in > >> > > >> > > >>there > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, > >>then > >> > > >>populates > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a > >>legacy > >> > > >> > > >>Configuration > >> > > >> > > >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, > >>IFAIK, I > >> > > >>can't use > >> > > >> > > >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in > >>flex-oem-compiler > >> > > >>does it > >> > > >> > > >>get > >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use > >>a > >> > > >>modified > >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change > >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration > >> > > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call > >>OEMUtil > >> > > >>and store > >> > > >> > > >>the > >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile > >>from > >> > > >>IntelliJ > >> > > >> > > >>to .swf > >> > > >> > > >> > > >/ .js > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK > >>can do > >> > > >>these > >> > > >> > > >>things in > >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a > >>library > >> > > >>within a > >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK? > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it > >>build > >> > > >>with Ant > >> > > >> > > >>tonight > >> > > >> > > >> > > >though, I'll keep you in touch. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hey, this is great progress. I’m going to be a while > >>on the > >> > > >>FDB for > >> > > >> > > >> > > Falcon so no hurry. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -Alex > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
