Hi Fred, Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of namespaces, therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had a theme pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK has a different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme tag.
I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the SDK folder will convince IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest into mxml-manifest. And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. Thanks for digging into this, -Alex On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Actually, it is more complicated. > >This is what it is generated by IJ: > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one overrides >the one of IJ apparently > >it results: > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 errors and 11 >warnings >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >MyModel. >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not >be found. >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could not be resolved to an >ActionScript class. It will be ignored. >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not >be found. >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >MyModel. >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >MyModel. >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'. >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'responseText'. >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'strings'. >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not be able to >detect assignments to 'allData'. >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController.as >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition models.MyModel could not >be found. >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >MyModel. >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >MyModel. >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly undefined method >MyModel. > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc : > >-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\flex-co >nfig.xml" >-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest.swf >-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest.swc >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml > >It builds. > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the framework, it results in >compilation error because it can't find mxml-2009-manifest.xml neither >the bundle resources, actually, the locale folder in my FlexJS SDK is >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my Flex SDK, the compilation >fails because the >it can't find the components from the >D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spark.cs >s > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100 >> >> Hi, >> >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to compile swc and js >>files from IntelliJ. >> >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to have things >>green though, also, despite, it passes a correct config.xml, the MXMLC >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib (the class is in the lib and >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with both include path and external >>and had the same result), did someone already tried this kind of config ? >> >> Thanks, >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100 >> > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does it >>get >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use a modified >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change getCompilerConfiguration >>to >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and store >>the >> > > config someplace. >> > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config and still make >>IJ happy. >> > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these >>things in >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library within a >> > > regular Flex SDK? >> > >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into either, we still >>need to add the FlexJS Lib + FlexJS SDK >> > >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000 >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> > > >> > > >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you look at >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe there is code in >>there >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, then populates >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config. >> > > > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a legacy >>Configuration >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, IFAIK, I can't use >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly. >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in flex-oem-compiler does it >>get >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use a modified >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change getCompilerConfiguration >>to >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call OEMUtil and store >>the >> > > config someplace. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile from IntelliJ >>to .swf >> > > >/ .js >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK can do these >>things in >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a library within a >> > > regular Flex SDK? >> > > >> > > > >> > > >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it build with Ant >>tonight >> > > >though, I'll keep you in touch. >> > > >> > > Hey, this is great progress. I’m going to be a while on the FDB for >> > > Falcon so no hurry. >> > > >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > >> >
