> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you look at
> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe there is code in there
> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, then populates
> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config.
IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a legacy Configuration nd from
there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, IFAIK, I can't use OEMUtil to give it
directly.
Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile from IntelliJ to .swf / .js
It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it build with Ant tonight
though, I'll keep you in touch.
Thanks,
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 06:41:54 +0000
>
>
>
> On 5/24/15, 11:21 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I seem to recall messing around with CompilerConfiguration when
> >> integrating with FB. So there may already be code that maps it to the
> >> Falcon configurations.
> >
> >Yes (well if I get you correctly) but with other package which then don't
> >work, the Falcon conf classes are not the ones IJ expect, I had to rely
> >on the legacy ones and I will have to tweak them at some point, at least,
> >I guess, when I will have to make them validate the new element in the
> >flex-config.xml
>
> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you look at
> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe there is code in there
> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, then populates
> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config.
>
> >
> >Also, my work is not clean and once clean, I will require your help with
> >Ant or better, will commit anyway in a branch and if you can make the Ant
> >build working, it would be nice, never been able to complete it with the
> >flex-oem-compiler and not only because of the tests but some
> >dependencies, I will come back to you with more detail when it will be
> >the time, in between, I build it with IJ.
>
> OK, I will help out with the Ant part when you are ready. Using a branch
> should work well.
>
> I’m done for tonight, I will check email in the morning. Sounds like you
> are making great progress.
>
> Thanks again,
> -Alex
>
