Maybe I should explain myself better (now that I'm not on a mobile device)

Because of Adobe's actions, I have ill-will towards Adobe.
On the other hand, because of Adobe's actions, I have more job
opportunities, and since I have switched over to JetBrain's tools, I also
have a much more productive and impressive Coding environment.
Except for the fact that I rely on the flashplayer, and read up on what it
can and can not do, I no longer use any Adobe products to program.
So while I still benefit from Adobe's work, I'm resentful about it in
general.  I can't label that anything but "being stupid".  It's likely
going to be a few years until I'm completely not using Adobe products at
all, but I imagine that day will come.  (Purely for emotional reasons)

As for Shumway, I don't understand how they plan on using pure Javascript
to handle things like multiple audio channels, or video recording, or .SOLs
without a browser plugin.  I'm sure they will get it to work on firefox,
but I don't see how it's going to work on any other browsers.  I'm also
curious what they are going to do with crossdomain.xml stuff.

brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 10/28/13 6:14 PM, "f...@dfguy.us" <f...@dfguy.us> wrote:
> >
> >My deal is I've always preferred the programming model in the flash
> >runtimes. The way you control graphics and objects and the organization
> >of flex project code is superior. Also the use of components and
> >extensibility of classes with flex and oo actionscript since version 3 is
> >so much better tgan javascript. I just wish there was more of an
> >enterprise focus from adobe with the runtimes since it makes it a hard
> >sell for professionals trying to promote the use of the runtimes and
> >framework to business given all of the focus on graphic design, gaming
> >and entertainment by Adobe now. Flex is great at eating data and
> >integrating with enterprise architectures ...
>
> Not sure what your favorite parts are, but unless you are doing lots of
> graphics in Flex, the FlexJS effort is trying to keep the things you like
> about AS3 and get it to work without Flash.
>
>

Reply via email to