On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:50:20 +0100 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> wrote:
> Agree that it may help testing to have l3fwd support on the testpmd. > > Two concerns, > 1) Testpmd already too complex. > 2) Code duplication. > > For 1), if the l3fwd can be implemented in testpmd as new, independent > forwarding mode, without touching rest of the testpmd, I think it can be OK. > > Not sure how to address 2), also lets say we want to add new feature to l3fwd, > where it should go, to the sample or to the testpmd? The original purpose of l3fwd seems to be getting lost here. It was intended as an example, not a complete test or real life application.
