28/04/2021 13:04, Stanisław Kardach: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:48 PM Bruce Richardson < > bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote: > <snip> > > > > I do not suggest pulling all these in. In our case, I see that the ask > > is only on LPM. I am open to hearing what others see as the requirement. > > > > > I think fib is the planned long-term replacement for lpm, and implements > > the same algorithm, so I think first versions should use it. > > If I may add my 2 cents. If a decision is made to implement any FIB/LPM > logic in testpmd, it would be great if a vector-only approach that is used > in l3fwd could be avoided. > While working on RISC-V port I had to disable l3fwd compilation for RISC-V > as it requires a vector engine (in l3fwd_em.c). The board I'm currently > using has rv64gc ISA which does not have vector extensions and I use > testpmd extensively for verification, hence it would be a shame to lose it.
Good point. That's why an example is not a test application, they have different goals.
