Am 18.12.2016 um 11:57 schrieb Duncan Jones:
On 18 Dec 2016, at 10:51, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18 December 2016 at 10:40, Pascal Schumacher
<pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
Am 18.12.2016 um 11:23 schrieb sebb:
It's definitely too specialised for LANG.
I do not think this is too specialized for LANG. RandomStringUtils has been
part of LANG since 1.0, and this is just an improved version of existing
functionality.
I don't think RandomStringUtils itself belongs in LANG, now that there
is a TEXT component.
Quite a few TEXT-like classes were added to LANG because there was nowhere else.
I agree with this. Creating random strings is not really a missing feature from
java.lang.*.
We should add a similar class to TEXT, but take the opportunity to simplify
some of the complicated semantics of the current version. We can then
deprecated RandomStringUtils and remove it in 4.0.
What about adding only your new methods (removing the Unicode suffix) as
RandomStringUtils to text?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
