On reflection, a bad choice of subject line. The other methods are Unicode-capable, but just very rooted in thinking about char data types.
> On 18 Dec 2016, at 06:38, Duncan Jones <dun...@wortharead.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’ve created a variation of RandomStringUtils.random(), which generates the > specified number of code points (rather than chars). > > Implementation can be seen here > (https://gist.github.com/dmjones500/da2f61a0234f428748417bf1443c0dff). > > Signature is: > > public static String randomUnicode(final int count, final int minCodePoint, > final int maxCodePoint, > final Set<CodePointPredicate> include, final Random random) > > > Expected overloads: > > > public static String randomUnicode(final int count, final int minCodePoint, > final int maxCodePoint, final Set<CodePointPredicate> include) > public static String randomUnicode(final int count, final int minCodePoint, > final int maxCodePoint) > public static String randomUnicode(final int count) > > And possibly: > > public static String randomNumberUnicode(final int count) > public static String randomAlphabeticUnicode(final int count) > public static String randomAlphanumericUnicode(final int count) > > > Any complaints if I add this to the code base? I’ve possibly overcomplicated > the predicate stuff, however it seemed the most flexible way to specify > requirements on the letters. I’ve created two built-in predicates, but more > could be supported (and users can create their own). > > Duncan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
