On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Woonsan Ko <woon_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Yeah, that's great! > State machine is a generic and simplistic concept which can be applied > anywhere. > In our case (Hippo), we want to leverage SCXML library as a core Document > Processing Engine. By exposing state machines in XML with ability to add > custom actions and other declarative configurations, we believe it can > increase customizability and flexibility in our product a lot. > I worked at a BPM company for several years in the past, so I'm very familiar > with process/workflow management as well, in both state machine based > approach or activity-flow based approach. State machine based approach should > fit better in our internal core document processing, I think. > > > I really hope to get involved in Commons-SCXML together. I've also worked for > Apache Portals project as committer (and PMC member) for several years and > release manager for Apache Portals Applications, too. I have been enjoyed > helping users/developers in the mailing lists and contributing to other ASF > projects (e.g, commons-lang, log4j2, camel, cxf, etc.). I do respect the > community and the Apache Way. > In any way, I'm really looking forward to helping it. > <snip/>
Cool, glad you're on board then. Thanks for the background above :-) -Rahul > Cheers, > > Woonsan > <snap/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
