Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> I'd tend to remove that package and use commons-logging in the >> traditional way, WDYT? > > Probably we should get rid of commons-logging to.
Why? > Its pretty outdated, > slf4j is more widely used. Not here in commons. slf4j is not used at all. > If we want to stick within apache code, I would take log4j - slf4j has > a wrapper for it. > > But commons logging has no more sense meanwhile. Or did i miss something? What gave you that impression? - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
