Hallo Christian :) I didn't want to change too much thing for this maintenance release, so making existing stuff in a stable version would be fine, but I agree that next versions should switch to more updated dependencies. BTW you help me on saying that a commons-logging wrapper doesn't have too much sense to be maintained, WDYT? Thanks in advance, alles gute, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd tend to remove that package and use commons-logging in the >> traditional way, WDYT? > > Probably we should get rid of commons-logging to. Its pretty outdated, > slf4j is more widely used. > If we want to stick within apache code, I would take log4j - slf4j has > a wrapper for it. > > But commons logging has no more sense meanwhile. Or did i miss something? > > > >> Many thanks in advance! >> Simo >> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/eDl >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
