Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > since I'm in the middle of the process of [discovery] review, I'd like > to discuss a little about the 'log' package[1]: It is a > commons-logging implementation wrapper that I don't understand the > reason why it has be implemented :( > Moreover the 90% of classes that use a Log instance, have a static > setter method... > > I'd tend to remove that package and use commons-logging in the > traditional way, WDYT?
IIRC discovery was also used as a jar ca be put into lib/endorsed. Having references there to commons-logging (or slf4j) would be fatal. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
