On 5 April 2011 10:31, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd tend to remove that package and use commons-logging in the >> traditional way, WDYT? > > Probably we should get rid of commons-logging to. Its pretty outdated, > slf4j is more widely used.
It's not outdated, it is just very stable, so has not needed a release. AIUI it's also very widely used as a dependency. > If we want to stick within apache code, I would take log4j - slf4j has > a wrapper for it. > > But commons logging has no more sense meanwhile. Or did i miss something? See above. If it aint broke, don't fix it. > > >> Many thanks in advance! >> Simo >> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/eDl >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
