Hi Jorg, [discovery] has already been depending to commons-logging (at least from 0.4, released on 2008), I just limited to upgrade it to latest stable version. Any suggestion? I filled a new jira issue to discuss about it DISCOVERY-15 Danke, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: > Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi all guys, >> since I'm in the middle of the process of [discovery] review, I'd like >> to discuss a little about the 'log' package[1]: It is a >> commons-logging implementation wrapper that I don't understand the >> reason why it has be implemented :( >> Moreover the 90% of classes that use a Log instance, have a static >> setter method... >> >> I'd tend to remove that package and use commons-logging in the >> traditional way, WDYT? > > IIRC discovery was also used as a jar ca be put into lib/endorsed. Having > references there to commons-logging (or slf4j) would be fatal. > > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
