> -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 6:19 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [all] Rebooting commons projects > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:33 PM > > To: Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [all] Rebooting commons projects > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Stephen Colebourne > > <scolebou...@btopenworld.com> wrote: > > > > > > Lets also say that the new project name cannot be numerically based, > so > > no > > > [lang2] or [lang5] projects, thats way too confusing. But [lang-ng] > > would be > > > ok. > > > > And, when we want to "reboot" again, we name it [lang-nng]? > > Right. I like what ApacheDs has done: 1.0.2 vs. 1.5: "The next version > after 1.0 is named 1.5, because we not only added some new functionalities > [sic], but we also switched to Java 5." [1] > > Gary
Ah, em, we cannot do exactly that of course but the idea is that a new project/version can reflect two ideas: A new JRE requirement and/or a new implementation of the project SO different to warrant a new project. Personally, I'd be happy with a [lang] 3.0 based on Java 5. Gary > > [1] http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/index.html > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
