On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Dan Fabulich <d...@fabulich.com> wrote: > If you feel like you'd want to call it "lang2" or "lang-ng" then just call > it lang 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever and keep a lang-1.x branch around for > stability fixes.
I thought we agreed that we would "jump" major version numbers (as you suggest here I think) whenever we are going to break backwards compatibility (which would include "next generation" type changes). Then, we would change the package name to match to avoid the "jar hell" issue. I don't like the "ng" stuff either. What's next? Commons Lang Deep Space 9? :) Doesn't a new major version number imply "next generation"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
