James Carman wrote at Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2009 04:30: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Dan Fabulich <d...@fabulich.com> wrote: >> If you feel like you'd want to call it "lang2" or "lang-ng" then just >> call it lang 2.0 or 3.0 or whatever and keep a lang-1.x branch around for >> stability fixes. > > I thought we agreed that we would "jump" major version numbers (as you > suggest here I think) whenever we are going to break backwards > compatibility (which would include "next generation" type changes). > Then, we would change the package name to match to avoid the "jar > hell" issue.
+1 > I don't like the "ng" stuff either. What's next? Commons Lang Deep > Space 9? :) Doesn't a new major version number imply "next > generation"? Hehehe ... reloaded? Fortunately we're forward bound, otherwise we would additionally talk about "origins" :)) - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
