Hi Christian. Thanks for your interest and advices. :) >>>is it possible to enhance Chain1 with RobustTask features instead of a complete replacement?
Yes, It`s a possible job. >>> All is very similar, and sometimes even Chain1 looks better to my eyes than RobustTask (for example i don't think that throwing with RuntimExceptions is a very good idea). But there are some cool things in chain2. Why not join forces? I am trying to find an right way to incubate Robust-Task. It can be the best way to join forces with original Chain but not a easy way. With providing Chain2`s features, ensuring backward compatibility with Chain might make Chain2 dizzy. I wonder this approach is a good way because I have been trying to keep Chain2 simple as possible. >>> Its usually a good start to work in issues first and dive into code. If you want, lets discuss about some features of RobustTask coming into Chain. Thank you very much. I will consider your advices. :) On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Min Cha, > > is it possible to enhance Chain1 with RobustTask features instead of a > complete replacement? All is very similar, and sometimes even Chain1 > looks better to my eyes than RobustTask (for example i don't think > that throwing with RuntimExceptions is a very good idea). But there > are some cool things in chain2. Why not join forces? > > There are some issues in Jira: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310462&fixfor=-1 > > Its usually a good start to work in issues first and dive into code. > If you want, lets discuss about some features of RobustTask coming > into Chain. > > Best, > Christian > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I suggested the ideas for Chain2 incubation to Commons mailing but didn`t > > receive any answers. So, I have written a short document to compare > Chain2 > > against the original Chain. > > > > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/ChainAndChain2 > > > > I would really like to start this project with Commons sponsoring so > Commons > > PMC`s interest is needed. Please, feel free to give me any advice. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> > > Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] The way for Chain2 > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > > > > > Oh, I`m so sorry to pick up this issue impatiently. I thought that > > discussion was over but it wasn`t. Now, the discussion is still > progressing > > at Incubator mailing. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi all. > >> > >> Unfortunately, Commons Incubator proposal seems not accepted by IPMC. > This > >> result is not a good news to me who wanted to start with Commons > Incubator. > >> > >> I would like to develop the next version of Chain and the seed for it is > >> Robust-Task which was introduced through a previous mail( > >> http://www.nabble.com/Robust-Task-introduction-td22571002.html). Now, > two > >> ways may be available in my opinion. > >> > >> 1. Proposal to IPMC > >> In this case, I would like that some of Commons PMCs and committers > become > >> mentors for Chain2. Also, as mentioned on Common Incubator proposal > >> discussion, I would like to use an option to graduate to Commons rather > than > >> TLP. In my opinion, this approach can be a good practice for Commons > which > >> may meet similar problems in the future. > >> > >> 2. Sandbox > >> In this case, I would become a contributor or a committer which should > >> learn Apache way. This is up to Commons PMC but I have already seen > Commons > >> PMC`s opinion about this problem through discussion. Of course, I > respect > >> and understand Commons PMC`s point of view. > >> > >> What is the better way? Please give me advice. > >> > >> -- > >> Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > >> Task Framework : > >> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > >> English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > >> Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > > Task Framework : > > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > > > > > > > > -- > > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > > Task Framework : > > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Min Cha, Dreaming Developer Task Framework : http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com
