Hi Min Cha, is it possible to enhance Chain1 with RobustTask features instead of a complete replacement? All is very similar, and sometimes even Chain1 looks better to my eyes than RobustTask (for example i don't think that throwing with RuntimExceptions is a very good idea). But there are some cool things in chain2. Why not join forces?
There are some issues in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310462&fixfor=-1 Its usually a good start to work in issues first and dive into code. If you want, lets discuss about some features of RobustTask coming into Chain. Best, Christian On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I suggested the ideas for Chain2 incubation to Commons mailing but didn`t > receive any answers. So, I have written a short document to compare Chain2 > against the original Chain. > > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/ChainAndChain2 > > I would really like to start this project with Commons sponsoring so Commons > PMC`s interest is needed. Please, feel free to give me any advice. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] The way for Chain2 > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > > Oh, I`m so sorry to pick up this issue impatiently. I thought that > discussion was over but it wasn`t. Now, the discussion is still progressing > at Incubator mailing. > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Unfortunately, Commons Incubator proposal seems not accepted by IPMC. This >> result is not a good news to me who wanted to start with Commons Incubator. >> >> I would like to develop the next version of Chain and the seed for it is >> Robust-Task which was introduced through a previous mail( >> http://www.nabble.com/Robust-Task-introduction-td22571002.html). Now, two >> ways may be available in my opinion. >> >> 1. Proposal to IPMC >> In this case, I would like that some of Commons PMCs and committers become >> mentors for Chain2. Also, as mentioned on Common Incubator proposal >> discussion, I would like to use an option to graduate to Commons rather than >> TLP. In my opinion, this approach can be a good practice for Commons which >> may meet similar problems in the future. >> >> 2. Sandbox >> In this case, I would become a contributor or a committer which should >> learn Apache way. This is up to Commons PMC but I have already seen Commons >> PMC`s opinion about this problem through discussion. Of course, I respect >> and understand Commons PMC`s point of view. >> >> What is the better way? Please give me advice. >> >> -- >> Min Cha, Dreaming Developer >> Task Framework : >> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction >> English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com >> Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com >> > > > > -- > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > Task Framework : > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > > > > -- > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > Task Framework : > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
