Hi there,

According to my understanding, they both seems have the same
fundamental goal. Then, I wonder whether there is a way to improve
commons chain with your suggestions.

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I suggested the ideas for Chain2 incubation to Commons mailing but didn`t
> receive any answers. So, I have written a short document to compare Chain2
> against the original Chain.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/ChainAndChain2
>
> I would really like to start this project with Commons sponsoring so Commons
> PMC`s interest is needed. Please, feel free to give me any advice.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] The way for Chain2
> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
>
>
> Oh, I`m so sorry to pick up this issue impatiently. I thought that
> discussion was over but it wasn`t. Now, the discussion is still progressing
> at Incubator mailing.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Unfortunately, Commons Incubator proposal seems not accepted by IPMC. This
>> result is not a good news to me who wanted to start with Commons Incubator.
>>
>> I would like to develop the next version of Chain and the seed for it is
>> Robust-Task which was introduced through a previous mail(
>> http://www.nabble.com/Robust-Task-introduction-td22571002.html). Now, two
>> ways may be available in my opinion.
>>
>> 1. Proposal to IPMC
>> In this case, I would like that some of Commons PMCs and committers become
>> mentors for Chain2. Also, as mentioned on Common Incubator proposal
>> discussion, I would like to use an option to graduate to Commons rather than
>> TLP. In my opinion, this approach can be a good practice for Commons which
>> may meet similar problems in the future.
>>
>> 2. Sandbox
>> In this case, I would become a contributor or a committer which should
>> learn Apache way. This is up to Commons PMC but I have already seen Commons
>> PMC`s opinion about this problem through discussion. Of course, I respect
>> and understand Commons PMC`s point of view.
>>
>> What is the better way? Please give me advice.
>>
>> --
>> Min Cha, Dreaming Developer
>> Task Framework :
>> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction
>> English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com
>> Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Min Cha, Dreaming Developer
> Task Framework :
> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction
> English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com
> Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com
>
>
>
> --
> Min Cha, Dreaming Developer
> Task Framework :
> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction
> English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com
> Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp.
edwardy...@apache.org
http://blog.udanax.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to