Hi there, According to my understanding, they both seems have the same fundamental goal. Then, I wonder whether there is a way to improve commons chain with your suggestions.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I suggested the ideas for Chain2 incubation to Commons mailing but didn`t > receive any answers. So, I have written a short document to compare Chain2 > against the original Chain. > > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/ChainAndChain2 > > I would really like to start this project with Commons sponsoring so Commons > PMC`s interest is needed. Please, feel free to give me any advice. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] The way for Chain2 > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > > Oh, I`m so sorry to pick up this issue impatiently. I thought that > discussion was over but it wasn`t. Now, the discussion is still progressing > at Incubator mailing. > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> Unfortunately, Commons Incubator proposal seems not accepted by IPMC. This >> result is not a good news to me who wanted to start with Commons Incubator. >> >> I would like to develop the next version of Chain and the seed for it is >> Robust-Task which was introduced through a previous mail( >> http://www.nabble.com/Robust-Task-introduction-td22571002.html). Now, two >> ways may be available in my opinion. >> >> 1. Proposal to IPMC >> In this case, I would like that some of Commons PMCs and committers become >> mentors for Chain2. Also, as mentioned on Common Incubator proposal >> discussion, I would like to use an option to graduate to Commons rather than >> TLP. In my opinion, this approach can be a good practice for Commons which >> may meet similar problems in the future. >> >> 2. Sandbox >> In this case, I would become a contributor or a committer which should >> learn Apache way. This is up to Commons PMC but I have already seen Commons >> PMC`s opinion about this problem through discussion. Of course, I respect >> and understand Commons PMC`s point of view. >> >> What is the better way? Please give me advice. >> >> -- >> Min Cha, Dreaming Developer >> Task Framework : >> http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction >> English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com >> Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com >> > > > > -- > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > Task Framework : > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > > > > -- > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > Task Framework : > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @ NHN, corp. edwardy...@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org