Oh, I`m so sorry to pick up this issue impatiently. I thought that discussion was over but it wasn`t. Now, the discussion is still progressing at Incubator mailing.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Min Cha <minslo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > Unfortunately, Commons Incubator proposal seems not accepted by IPMC. This > result is not a good news to me who wanted to start with Commons Incubator. > > I would like to develop the next version of Chain and the seed for it is > Robust-Task which was introduced through a previous mail( > http://www.nabble.com/Robust-Task-introduction-td22571002.html). Now, two > ways may be available in my opinion. > > 1. Proposal to IPMC > In this case, I would like that some of Commons PMCs and committers become > mentors for Chain2. Also, as mentioned on Common Incubator proposal > discussion, I would like to use an option to graduate to Commons rather than > TLP. In my opinion, this approach can be a good practice for Commons which > may meet similar problems in the future. > > 2. Sandbox > In this case, I would become a contributor or a committer which should > learn Apache way. This is up to Commons PMC but I have already seen Commons > PMC`s opinion about this problem through discussion. Of course, I respect > and understand Commons PMC`s point of view. > > What is the better way? Please give me advice. > > -- > Min Cha, Dreaming Developer > Task Framework : > http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction > English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com > Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com > -- Min Cha, Dreaming Developer Task Framework : http://code.google.com/p/robust-coupe/wiki/RobustTaskIntroduction English : http://minslovey.blogspot.com Korean : http://minslovey.tistory.com
