1. +1 nb 2. +1 nb 3. +1 nb I am personally excited for the foundation this new work lays. Multi-partition transactions will enable many new features and I don’t think we should hold up it’s development for missing conceptual SQL support when the community hasn’t decided on going in the SQL direction. It also seems to have been developed with high standards when it comes to quality and testing which I applaud.
Jordan On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:11 PM sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to all > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:57 AM C. Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net> > wrote: > > > 1. +1nb > > 2. +1nb > > 3. +1nb > > > > It’s been encouraging to follow discussion advancing potential > > enhancements to this proposal on the other threads. > > > > I disagree that it is a good outcome for the project and the Apache > > Cassandra user community to veto significant progress in this area on > > grounds that the CEP does not contain a design for a feature that is a > > non-goal of the initial scope proposed by the CEP, and which is also not > > precluded by the CEP. > > > > - Scott > > > > > On Oct 14, 2021, at 11:27 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko <alek...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 on all points > > > > > >> On 14 Oct 2021, at 17:31, bened...@apache.org wrote: > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> I would like to start a vote on this CEP, split into three > > sub-decisions, as discussion has been circular for some time. > > >> 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > > >> 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > > Cassandra? > > >> 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions > in > > Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? > > >> The first vote is a consensus vote of all committers, the second and > > third however are about project direction and therefore are simple > majority > > votes of the PMC. > > >> Recall that all -1 votes must be accompanied by an explanation. If you > > reject the CEP only on grounds (2) or (3) you should not veto the > proposal. > > If a majority reject grounds (2) or (3) then transaction developments > will > > halt for the time being. > > >> This vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > > > >
