> > 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > Cassandra? > 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in > Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? >
1. -1 There's discussions still ongoing around this CEP. I support the CEP but believe it is important that the community takes the patience to let everyone say their piece and feel that they have been heard. I do not see that waiting a week, or two, before another vote risks the inclusion of this CEP in this release cycle. I've certainly appreciated reading through every question raised, and wouldn't object to the CEP page being updated to include even more (but this is not a blocker for me).
