+1 to all On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:57 AM C. Scott Andreas <sc...@paradoxica.net> wrote:
> 1. +1nb > 2. +1nb > 3. +1nb > > It’s been encouraging to follow discussion advancing potential > enhancements to this proposal on the other threads. > > I disagree that it is a good outcome for the project and the Apache > Cassandra user community to veto significant progress in this area on > grounds that the CEP does not contain a design for a feature that is a > non-goal of the initial scope proposed by the CEP, and which is also not > precluded by the CEP. > > - Scott > > > On Oct 14, 2021, at 11:27 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko <alek...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > +1 on all points > > > >> On 14 Oct 2021, at 17:31, bened...@apache.org wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> I would like to start a vote on this CEP, split into three > sub-decisions, as discussion has been circular for some time. > >> 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > >> 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > Cassandra? > >> 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in > Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? > >> The first vote is a consensus vote of all committers, the second and > third however are about project direction and therefore are simple majority > votes of the PMC. > >> Recall that all -1 votes must be accompanied by an explanation. If you > reject the CEP only on grounds (2) or (3) you should not veto the proposal. > If a majority reject grounds (2) or (3) then transaction developments will > halt for the time being. > >> This vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > >
