1. +1 2. +1 nb 3. +1 nb nb on 2. and 3. as I am not pmc (if I got this voting logic right)
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 18:36, Blake Eggleston <beggles...@apple.com.invalid> wrote: > > 1. +1 > 2. +1 > 3. +1 > > > On Oct 14, 2021, at 9:31 AM, bened...@apache.org wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote on this CEP, split into three sub-decisions, > > as discussion has been circular for some time. > > > > 1. Do you support adopting this CEP? > > 2. Do you support the transaction semantics proposed by the CEP for > > Cassandra? > > 3. Do you support an incremental approach to developing transactions in > > Cassandra, leaving scope for future development? > > > > The first vote is a consensus vote of all committers, the second and third > > however are about project direction and therefore are simple majority votes > > of the PMC. > > > > Recall that all -1 votes must be accompanied by an explanation. If you > > reject the CEP only on grounds (2) or (3) you should not veto the proposal. > > If a majority reject grounds (2) or (3) then transaction developments will > > halt for the time being. > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
