did you test this with current master before enabling in bookkeeper-master
job? It somehow broke the jenkins.

because I saw ClassNotFoundException in latest jekins build.

https://builds.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/bookkeeper-master/detail/bookkeeper-master/1889/pipeline



On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have updated master job
> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-master/
>
> let's see the results
> -- Enrico
>
> 2017-08-24 10:27 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
>
>> It seems that JaCoCo works like a charm
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/3/console
>> https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper
>>
>> I will integrate it into nightly builds, the only concern is that
>> CodeCoverage instrumentation may affect tests
>> thoughts ?
>>
>> -- Enrico
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-08-24 2:09 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> 👍
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > 2017-08-23 17:34 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > > On Aug 23, 2017 7:31 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > 2017-08-23 8:29 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Latest news
>>> > > >
>>> > > > The build works and coveralls reports a 63% code coverage.
>>> > > > Maybe the link to the badge on readme.md is wrong, I will check
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Our core in README.md is good, but github caches images, this is the
>>> good
>>> > > link but GitHub cached an old version of the image
>>> > > https://coveralls.io/repos/github/apache/bookkeeper/
>>> > > badge.svg?branch=master
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > Cobertura reports a lot of parsing errors, I will continue to try
>>> > JaCoCo
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I have tried with JaCoCo the result is similar, but there are no
>>> "scary"
>>> > > message on console output like this:
>>> > >
>>> > > net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.ParseException:
>>> Encountered
>>> > > " "default" "default "" at line 332, column 5.
>>> > > Was expecting one of:
>>> > >     "abstract" ...
>>> > >     "boolean" ...
>>> > >     "byte" ...
>>> > >     "char" ...
>>> > >     "class" ...
>>> > >     "double" ...
>>> > >     "enum" ...
>>> > >     "final" ...
>>> > >     "float" ...
>>> > >     "int" ...
>>> > >     "interface" ...
>>> > >     "long" ...
>>> > >     "native" ...
>>> > >     "private" ...
>>> > >     "protected" ...
>>> > >     "public" ...
>>> > >     "short" ...
>>> > >     "static" ...
>>> > >     "strictfp" ...
>>> > >     "synchronized" ...
>>> > >     "transient" ...
>>> > >     "void" ...
>>> > >     "volatile" ...
>>> > >     <IDENTIFIER> ...
>>> > >     "}" ...
>>> > >     ";" ...
>>> > >     "@" ...
>>> > >     "<" ...
>>> > >
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>>> > > generateParseException(JavaParser.java:10490)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.jj_
>>> > > consume_token(JavaParser.java:10366)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>>> > > UnmodifiedInterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1475)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>>> > > InterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1273)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>>> > > TypeDeclaration(JavaParser.java:580)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>>> > > CompilationUnit(JavaParser.java:318)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>>> > > parse(JavaParser.java:100)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
>>> > > measureSource(Javancss.java:192)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
>>> > > measureRoot(Javancss.java:268)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss.<init>(
>>> > > Javancss.java:347)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.JavancssFactory.
>>> > > newInstance(JavancssFactory.java:40)
>>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.reporting.ComplexityCalculator.
>>> > > getFunctionMetricsForSingleFile(ComplexityCalculator.java:243)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Maybe it is better to switch to JaCoCo, Cobertura wants to read java
>>> code
>>> > > but cannot handle Java8 default methods interface syntax
>>> > >
>>> > > Issue:
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/464
>>> > >
>>> > > Patch to introduce the configuration:
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/465
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Good job! I made one comment in the pull request. Otherwise, overall
>>> > looks
>>> > > good.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Once we have a stable code coverage tool I would like to setup an
>>> > automatic
>>> > > check upon Pull Requests
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Sure, are you planning to enforce pull request should increase
>>> coverage?
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > It would be great
>>> > but I think it is not really possible, sometimes we have patches on the
>>> > website or on poms
>>> > I have to understand better how code coverage tools work
>>> > for instance I see that interfaces code seems to be "uncovered" so
>>> > introducing a new interface will decrease the coverage
>>> > I have to play with it
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thoughts ?
>>> > >
>>> > > Enrico
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I will try on DL to in case we have to switch
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Enrico
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On mar 22 ago 2017, 22:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> 2017-08-22 21:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>> Hi Enrico,
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> You should use 'ubuntu' rather than 'Ubuntu' (it is case
>>> sensitive).
>>> > > It
>>> > > >>> is
>>> > > >>> running now -
>>> > > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/1/console
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> Thank you. I thought I had tried but without success.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>> Also It would be good to put code-coverage into
>>> > > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-release-nightly-sna
>>> pshot/
>>> > > >>> eventually.
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> I will play and the integrate the two jobs
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Thank you very much
>>> > > >> Enrico
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> - Sijie
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >>> > I will check it tomorrow.
>>> > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> > On Aug 20, 2017 1:23 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
>>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>> > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> Sijie,
>>> > > >>> >> I am not able to make the new job run
>>> > > >>> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >> I cannot find any available node, I tried with ubumtu and
>>> haddop,
>>> > > with
>>> > > >>> >> different cases for the first char
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >> Ideas?
>>> > > >>> >> Enrico
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >> On sab 19 ago 2017, 15:35 Enrico Olivelli <
>>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> wrote:
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >> > I have created a new jenkins job
>>> > > >>> >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> > emails will be sent to my address eolive...@apache.org
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> > I am playing with cobertura, if I won't succeed I will
>>> create a
>>> > PR
>>> > > >>> in
>>> > > >>> >> > order to introduce the configuration of JaCoCo on master
>>> branch
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> > Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> > 2017-08-04 21:55 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> Sure go for it.
>>> > > >>> >> >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> Sijie
>>> > > >>> >> >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> On Aug 4, 2017 12:46 PM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
>>> > eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> >> wrote:
>>> > > >>> >> >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > Il gio 20 lug 2017, 17:06 Enrico Olivelli <
>>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >
>>> > > >>> ha
>>> > > >>> >> >> > scritto:
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > Jacoco is running as expected
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > see:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > https://coveralls.io/jobs/27785961
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > I think it is better to switch to Jacoco
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > I wonder why on DL there is no such problem with
>>> Cobertura
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > @Sijie do you have any idea ?
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > Other opinions? I am going to test codecov.io too in
>>> other
>>> > > >>> projects
>>> > > >>> >> and
>>> > > >>> >> >> > compare the results
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > 2017-07-20 16:06 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> I am sorry but it seems that cobertura is not working
>>> with
>>> > > >>> java8,
>>> > > >>> >> as
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> reported in Coveralls.io homepage
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> https://github.com/trautonen/coveralls-maven-plugin
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> see our error:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/
>>> bookkeeper-tests/6/console
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> I will be back to Jacoco which seems to be the only
>>> one
>>> > > which
>>> > > >>> >> >> supports
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> java8 for Coveralls
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >> 2017-07-19 18:02 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
>>> guosi...@gmail.com
>>> > >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Hmm he should mail you the token rather then posting
>>> on
>>> > the
>>> > > >>> jira
>>> > > >>> >> :)
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> On Jul 19, 2017 8:56 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
>>> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > wrote:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > We have the token, it is in the ticket.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > I will do some tests soon
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > Il mer 19 lug 2017, 17:52 Enrico Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> ha
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > scritto:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > this is the INFRA ticket for having a
>>> coveralls.io
>>> > > >>> token in
>>> > > >>> >> our
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > builds
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>> /browse/INFRA-14649
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > 2017-07-17 23:49 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> >> eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Il lun 17 lug 2017, 22:55 Sijie Guo <
>>> > > guosi...@gmail.com
>>> > > >
>>> > > >>> ha
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Enrico
>>> Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Il lun 17 lug 2017, 21:34 Sijie Guo <
>>> > > >>> guosi...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> >> ha
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Enrico
>>> > Olivelli
>>> > > <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > I have just committed coveralls.io and
>>> > > cobertura
>>> > > >>> >> >> plugins
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> into
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > main
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > pom.xml
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > (as DistributedLog does)
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > The next step is to enable cobertura and
>>> > tests
>>> > > in
>>> > > >>> >> >> Travis.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Currently we do not run tests on Travis
>>> > because
>>> > > >>> it is
>>> > > >>> >> >> very
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> slow.....
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > any ideas ?
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > I believe you need a coveralls token for
>>> > > reporting
>>> > > >>> the
>>> > > >>> >> >> > coverage
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> results.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > Jenkins is probably better for this purpose
>>> > > >>> because the
>>> > > >>> >> >> token
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> has
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > to
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> be
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > store secretly.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > In this doc it seems that using the coveralls
>>> > > plugin
>>> > > >>> >> inside
>>> > > >>> >> >> a
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> travis
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> build
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > does not require tokens
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/trautonen/
>>> > > >>> coveralls-maven-plugin/blob/
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > master/README.md
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> I barely remembered that it doesn't actually
>>> work,
>>> > > but
>>> > > >>> I
>>> > > >>> >> >> might be
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > wrong.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> I just pinged infra, my email was not responded
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Meanwhile I am going to submit a PR with
>>> a
>>> > > >>> change in
>>> > > >>> >> >> Travis
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > config
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> in
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > order
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > to test Cobertura speed on Travis
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > 2017-07-06 17:30 GMT+02:00 Enrico
>>> Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > 2017-07-05 16:13 GMT+02:00 Enrico
>>> Olivelli
>>> > <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> 2017-07-05 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > guosi...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> It would be worth checking with the
>>> INFRA
>>> > > to
>>> > > >>> see
>>> > > >>> >> >> what
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> kind of
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> code
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coverage
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> that it provides. I remembered that
>>> a few
>>> > > ASF
>>> > > >>> >> >> projects
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> using
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coveralls.io,
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> INFRA can enable this for you and
>>> give
>>> > you
>>> > > an
>>> > > >>> >> token
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> which you
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> can
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> configure
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> in the CI job. I think coveralls
>>> supports
>>> > > >>> JaCoco.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> I will sent and email to INFRA and
>>> come
>>> > back
>>> > > >>> with
>>> > > >>> >> the
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> response
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > no answer from INFRA
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > meanwhile I was playing with
>>> coveralls.io
>>> > > and
>>> > > >>> I
>>> > > >>> >> found
>>> > > >>> >> >> > the
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> our
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> repo
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > is
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > somehow already configured, see
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://coveralls.io/github/
>>> > > apache/bookkeeper
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I don't know whoever did it
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > It seams that in order to have such
>>> service
>>> > > use
>>> > > >>> >> have
>>> > > >>> >> >> to
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> include
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > JaCoCo
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > maven plugin, then enable some
>>> automatic
>>> > > build
>>> > > >>> >> using
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins or
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Travis
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > and
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > then add another coveralls plugin
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > see this interesting document
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://github.com/
>>> > > >>> asciidoctor/asciidoctor/wiki/
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > Coveralls.io-configuration-
>>> > > for-maven-projects
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I think that the starting point is to
>>> > > integrate
>>> > > >>> >> JaCoco
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> Sijie
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> On Jul 5, 2017 1:57 AM, "Enrico
>>> > Olivelli" <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > I am attaching a report (I am using
>>> > > Google
>>> > > >>> >> Drive
>>> > > >>> >> >> as
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> most
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> email
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > clients
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> will
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > block attachments with html
>>> inside) .
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Just untar and play with your
>>> browser
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > 2017-07-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Dávid
>>> > > Szigecsán
>>> > > >>> <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > SonarCloud is free for open
>>> source.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > https://about.sonarcloud.io/
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Yes I known
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > recently we have activated Travis
>>> CI, I
>>> > > >>> think
>>> > > >>> >> that
>>> > > >>> >> >> > the
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > trend
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> is
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > to
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > integrate with such free tools in
>>> order
>>> > > to
>>> > > >>> >> achieve
>>> > > >>> >> >> > the
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> best
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> with
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > the minimum effort
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > 2017-07-04 18:15 GMT+02:00 Enrico
>>> > > >>> Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Il mar 4 lug 2017, 18:08 Dávid
>>> > > >>> Szigecsán <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > ha
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > scritto:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > +1
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > What do you think about
>>> sonar? :)
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> I am using sonar in projects in
>>> my
>>> > > >>> company,
>>> > > >>> >> it
>>> > > >>> >> >> is
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> great.
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> But it needs a server, so it is
>>> not
>>> > > >>> easy to
>>> > > >>> >> use
>>> > > >>> >> >> > for
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> everyone
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > 2017-07-04 17:24 GMT+02:00
>>> Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> Olivelli <
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > eolive...@gmail.com
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >:
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > Hi all,
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > as we are in the mood of
>>> > enhancing
>>> > > >>> >> >> automatic
>>> > > >>> >> >> > QA
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> and
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > of
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > BookKeeper I have created
>>> this
>>> > > >>> issue in
>>> > > >>> >> >> order
>>> > > >>> >> >> > to
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> introduce
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> JaCoCo in
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > the build/test pipeline
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/
>>> > > >>> >> >> > bookkeeper/issues/232
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > I will do some tests and
>>> report
>>> > to
>>> > > >>> the
>>> > > >>> >> >> > comunity
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > -- Enrico
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> --
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >  bookkeeper-server-jacoco.tar.gz
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > <https://drive.google.com/
>>> > > >>> file/d/0Bz7lsWhNTGF-
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > OVZFblRpZE00Nz
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> A/view?usp=
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > drive_web>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > --
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> --
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > --
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>>> > > >>> >> >> > > --
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >>> >> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> >>
>>> > > >>> >> >
>>> > > >>> >> > --
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >>> >>
>>> > > >>> >
>>> > > >>>
>>> > > >> --
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to