It seems that JaCoCo works like a charm
https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/3/console
https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper

I will integrate it into nightly builds, the only concern is that
CodeCoverage instrumentation may affect tests
thoughts ?

-- Enrico



2017-08-24 2:09 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>:

> 👍
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 2017-08-23 17:34 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > On Aug 23, 2017 7:31 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2017-08-23 8:29 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Latest news
> > > >
> > > > The build works and coveralls reports a 63% code coverage.
> > > > Maybe the link to the badge on readme.md is wrong, I will check
> > > >
> > >
> > > Our core in README.md is good, but github caches images, this is the
> good
> > > link but GitHub cached an old version of the image
> > > https://coveralls.io/repos/github/apache/bookkeeper/
> > > badge.svg?branch=master
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Cobertura reports a lot of parsing errors, I will continue to try
> > JaCoCo
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have tried with JaCoCo the result is similar, but there are no
> "scary"
> > > message on console output like this:
> > >
> > > net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.ParseException: Encountered
> > > " "default" "default "" at line 332, column 5.
> > > Was expecting one of:
> > >     "abstract" ...
> > >     "boolean" ...
> > >     "byte" ...
> > >     "char" ...
> > >     "class" ...
> > >     "double" ...
> > >     "enum" ...
> > >     "final" ...
> > >     "float" ...
> > >     "int" ...
> > >     "interface" ...
> > >     "long" ...
> > >     "native" ...
> > >     "private" ...
> > >     "protected" ...
> > >     "public" ...
> > >     "short" ...
> > >     "static" ...
> > >     "strictfp" ...
> > >     "synchronized" ...
> > >     "transient" ...
> > >     "void" ...
> > >     "volatile" ...
> > >     <IDENTIFIER> ...
> > >     "}" ...
> > >     ";" ...
> > >     "@" ...
> > >     "<" ...
> > >
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> > > generateParseException(JavaParser.java:10490)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.jj_
> > > consume_token(JavaParser.java:10366)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> > > UnmodifiedInterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1475)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> > > InterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1273)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> > > TypeDeclaration(JavaParser.java:580)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> > > CompilationUnit(JavaParser.java:318)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> > > parse(JavaParser.java:100)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
> > > measureSource(Javancss.java:192)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
> > > measureRoot(Javancss.java:268)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss.<init>(
> > > Javancss.java:347)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.JavancssFactory.
> > > newInstance(JavancssFactory.java:40)
> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.reporting.ComplexityCalculator.
> > > getFunctionMetricsForSingleFile(ComplexityCalculator.java:243)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe it is better to switch to JaCoCo, Cobertura wants to read java
> code
> > > but cannot handle Java8 default methods interface syntax
> > >
> > > Issue:
> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/464
> > >
> > > Patch to introduce the configuration:
> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/465
> > >
> > >
> > > Good job! I made one comment in the pull request. Otherwise, overall
> > looks
> > > good.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Once we have a stable code coverage tool I would like to setup an
> > automatic
> > > check upon Pull Requests
> > >
> > >
> > > Sure, are you planning to enforce pull request should increase
> coverage?
> > >
> >
> >
> > It would be great
> > but I think it is not really possible, sometimes we have patches on the
> > website or on poms
> > I have to understand better how code coverage tools work
> > for instance I see that interfaces code seems to be "uncovered" so
> > introducing a new interface will decrease the coverage
> > I have to play with it
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I will try on DL to in case we have to switch
> > > >
> > > > Enrico
> > > >
> > > > On mar 22 ago 2017, 22:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> 2017-08-22 21:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Enrico,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> You should use 'ubuntu' rather than 'Ubuntu' (it is case
> sensitive).
> > > It
> > > >>> is
> > > >>> running now -
> > > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/1/console
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >> Thank you. I thought I had tried but without success.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Also It would be good to put code-coverage into
> > > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-release-nightly-snapshot/
> > > >>> eventually.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> I will play and the integrate the two jobs
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you very much
> > > >> Enrico
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - Sijie
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > I will check it tomorrow.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Aug 20, 2017 1:23 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> Sijie,
> > > >>> >> I am not able to make the new job run
> > > >>> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> I cannot find any available node, I tried with ubumtu and
> haddop,
> > > with
> > > >>> >> different cases for the first char
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> Ideas?
> > > >>> >> Enrico
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> On sab 19 ago 2017, 15:35 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> > I have created a new jenkins job
> > > >>> >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> > emails will be sent to my address eolive...@apache.org
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> > I am playing with cobertura, if I won't succeed I will create
> a
> > PR
> > > >>> in
> > > >>> >> > order to introduce the configuration of JaCoCo on master
> branch
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> > Enrico
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> > 2017-08-04 21:55 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> Sure go for it.
> > > >>> >> >>
> > > >>> >> >> Sijie
> > > >>> >> >>
> > > >>> >> >> On Aug 4, 2017 12:46 PM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
> > eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >> wrote:
> > > >>> >> >>
> > > >>> >> >> > Il gio 20 lug 2017, 17:06 Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >>> ha
> > > >>> >> >> > scritto:
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > > Jacoco is running as expected
> > > >>> >> >> > > see:
> > > >>> >> >> > > https://coveralls.io/jobs/27785961
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > > I think it is better to switch to Jacoco
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > > I wonder why on DL there is no such problem with
> Cobertura
> > > >>> >> >> > > @Sijie do you have any idea ?
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > Other opinions? I am going to test codecov.io too in other
> > > >>> projects
> > > >>> >> and
> > > >>> >> >> > compare the results
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > > -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > > 2017-07-20 16:06 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>> >> >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >> I am sorry but it seems that cobertura is not working
> with
> > > >>> java8,
> > > >>> >> as
> > > >>> >> >> > >> reported in Coveralls.io homepage
> > > >>> >> >> > >> https://github.com/trautonen/coveralls-maven-plugin
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >> see our error:
> > > >>> >> >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/
> bookkeeper-tests/6/console
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >> I will be back to Jacoco which seems to be the only one
> > > which
> > > >>> >> >> supports
> > > >>> >> >> > >> java8 for Coveralls
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >> -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >> 2017-07-19 18:02 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
> guosi...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Hmm he should mail you the token rather then posting on
> > the
> > > >>> jira
> > > >>> >> :)
> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> On Jul 19, 2017 8:56 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >> >> > wrote:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > We have the token, it is in the ticket.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > I will do some tests soon
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > Il mer 19 lug 2017, 17:52 Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> ha
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > scritto:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > this is the INFRA ticket for having a coveralls.io
> > > >>> token in
> > > >>> >> our
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > builds
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14649
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > 2017-07-17 23:49 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >>> >> eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Il lun 17 lug 2017, 22:55 Sijie Guo <
> > > guosi...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >>> ha
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Enrico Olivelli
> <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Il lun 17 lug 2017, 21:34 Sijie Guo <
> > > >>> guosi...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >> ha
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Enrico
> > Olivelli
> > > <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > I have just committed coveralls.io and
> > > cobertura
> > > >>> >> >> plugins
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> into
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > main
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > pom.xml
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > (as DistributedLog does)
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > The next step is to enable cobertura and
> > tests
> > > in
> > > >>> >> >> Travis.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Currently we do not run tests on Travis
> > because
> > > >>> it is
> > > >>> >> >> very
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> slow.....
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > any ideas ?
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > I believe you need a coveralls token for
> > > reporting
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> >> >> > coverage
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> results.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > Jenkins is probably better for this purpose
> > > >>> because the
> > > >>> >> >> token
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> has
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > to
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> be
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > store secretly.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > In this doc it seems that using the coveralls
> > > plugin
> > > >>> >> inside
> > > >>> >> >> a
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> travis
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> build
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > does not require tokens
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/trautonen/
> > > >>> coveralls-maven-plugin/blob/
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > master/README.md
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> I barely remembered that it doesn't actually
> work,
> > > but
> > > >>> I
> > > >>> >> >> might be
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > wrong.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> I just pinged infra, my email was not responded
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Meanwhile I am going to submit a PR with a
> > > >>> change in
> > > >>> >> >> Travis
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > config
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> in
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > order
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > to test Cobertura speed on Travis
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > 2017-07-06 17:30 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli
> <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > 2017-07-05 16:13 GMT+02:00 Enrico
> Olivelli
> > <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> 2017-07-05 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
> > > >>> >> >> > guosi...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> It would be worth checking with the
> INFRA
> > > to
> > > >>> see
> > > >>> >> >> what
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> kind of
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> code
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coverage
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> that it provides. I remembered that a
> few
> > > ASF
> > > >>> >> >> projects
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> using
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coveralls.io,
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> INFRA can enable this for you and give
> > you
> > > an
> > > >>> >> token
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> which you
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> can
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> configure
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> in the CI job. I think coveralls
> supports
> > > >>> JaCoco.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> I will sent and email to INFRA and come
> > back
> > > >>> with
> > > >>> >> the
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> response
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > no answer from INFRA
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > meanwhile I was playing with
> coveralls.io
> > > and
> > > >>> I
> > > >>> >> found
> > > >>> >> >> > the
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> our
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> repo
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > is
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > somehow already configured, see
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://coveralls.io/github/
> > > apache/bookkeeper
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I don't know whoever did it
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > It seams that in order to have such
> service
> > > use
> > > >>> >> have
> > > >>> >> >> to
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> include
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > JaCoCo
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > maven plugin, then enable some automatic
> > > build
> > > >>> >> using
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins or
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Travis
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > and
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > then add another coveralls plugin
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > see this interesting document
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://github.com/
> > > >>> asciidoctor/asciidoctor/wiki/
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > Coveralls.io-configuration-
> > > for-maven-projects
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I think that the starting point is to
> > > integrate
> > > >>> >> JaCoco
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> Sijie
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> On Jul 5, 2017 1:57 AM, "Enrico
> > Olivelli" <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > I am attaching a report (I am using
> > > Google
> > > >>> >> Drive
> > > >>> >> >> as
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> most
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> email
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > clients
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> will
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > block attachments with html inside) .
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Just untar and play with your browser
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > 2017-07-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Dávid
> > > Szigecsán
> > > >>> <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > SonarCloud is free for open source.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > https://about.sonarcloud.io/
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Yes I known
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > recently we have activated Travis
> CI, I
> > > >>> think
> > > >>> >> that
> > > >>> >> >> > the
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > trend
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> is
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > to
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > integrate with such free tools in
> order
> > > to
> > > >>> >> achieve
> > > >>> >> >> > the
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> best
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> with
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > the minimum effort
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > 2017-07-04 18:15 GMT+02:00 Enrico
> > > >>> Olivelli <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Il mar 4 lug 2017, 18:08 Dávid
> > > >>> Szigecsán <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > ha
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > scritto:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > +1
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > What do you think about sonar?
> :)
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> I am using sonar in projects in my
> > > >>> company,
> > > >>> >> it
> > > >>> >> >> is
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> great.
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> But it needs a server, so it is
> not
> > > >>> easy to
> > > >>> >> use
> > > >>> >> >> > for
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> everyone
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > 2017-07-04 17:24 GMT+02:00
> Enrico
> > > >>> >> Olivelli <
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > eolive...@gmail.com
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >:
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > Hi all,
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > as we are in the mood of
> > enhancing
> > > >>> >> >> automatic
> > > >>> >> >> > QA
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> and
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > of
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > BookKeeper I have created this
> > > >>> issue in
> > > >>> >> >> order
> > > >>> >> >> > to
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> introduce
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> JaCoCo in
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > the build/test pipeline
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/
> > > >>> >> >> > bookkeeper/issues/232
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > I will do some tests and
> report
> > to
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> >> >> > comunity
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > -- Enrico
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> --
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >  bookkeeper-server-jacoco.tar.gz
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > <https://drive.google.com/
> > > >>> file/d/0Bz7lsWhNTGF-
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > OVZFblRpZE00Nz
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> A/view?usp=
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > drive_web>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > --
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> --
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > --
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > >>
> > > >>> >> >> > > --
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >>> >> >> >
> > > >>> >> >>
> > > >>> >> >
> > > >>> >> > --
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >>> >>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >> --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to