2017-08-23 17:34 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:

> On Aug 23, 2017 7:31 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2017-08-23 8:29 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Latest news
> >
> > The build works and coveralls reports a 63% code coverage.
> > Maybe the link to the badge on readme.md is wrong, I will check
> >
>
> Our core in README.md is good, but github caches images, this is the good
> link but GitHub cached an old version of the image
> https://coveralls.io/repos/github/apache/bookkeeper/
> badge.svg?branch=master
>
>
>
> > Cobertura reports a lot of parsing errors, I will continue to try JaCoCo
> >
>
> I have tried with JaCoCo the result is similar, but there are no "scary"
> message on console output like this:
>
> net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.ParseException: Encountered
> " "default" "default "" at line 332, column 5.
> Was expecting one of:
>     "abstract" ...
>     "boolean" ...
>     "byte" ...
>     "char" ...
>     "class" ...
>     "double" ...
>     "enum" ...
>     "final" ...
>     "float" ...
>     "int" ...
>     "interface" ...
>     "long" ...
>     "native" ...
>     "private" ...
>     "protected" ...
>     "public" ...
>     "short" ...
>     "static" ...
>     "strictfp" ...
>     "synchronized" ...
>     "transient" ...
>     "void" ...
>     "volatile" ...
>     <IDENTIFIER> ...
>     "}" ...
>     ";" ...
>     "@" ...
>     "<" ...
>
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> generateParseException(JavaParser.java:10490)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.jj_
> consume_token(JavaParser.java:10366)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> UnmodifiedInterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1475)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> InterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1273)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> TypeDeclaration(JavaParser.java:580)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> CompilationUnit(JavaParser.java:318)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
> parse(JavaParser.java:100)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
> measureSource(Javancss.java:192)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
> measureRoot(Javancss.java:268)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss.<init>(
> Javancss.java:347)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.JavancssFactory.
> newInstance(JavancssFactory.java:40)
>         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.reporting.ComplexityCalculator.
> getFunctionMetricsForSingleFile(ComplexityCalculator.java:243)
>
>
>
> Maybe it is better to switch to JaCoCo, Cobertura wants to read java code
> but cannot handle Java8 default methods interface syntax
>
> Issue:
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/464
>
> Patch to introduce the configuration:
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/465
>
>
> Good job! I made one comment in the pull request. Otherwise, overall looks
> good.
>
>
>
>
> Once we have a stable code coverage tool I would like to setup an automatic
> check upon Pull Requests
>
>
> Sure, are you planning to enforce pull request should increase coverage?
>


It would be great
but I think it is not really possible, sometimes we have patches on the
website or on poms
I have to understand better how code coverage tools work
for instance I see that interfaces code seems to be "uncovered" so
introducing a new interface will decrease the coverage
I have to play with it


>
>
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Enrico
>
>
>
> I will try on DL to in case we have to switch
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > On mar 22 ago 2017, 22:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 2017-08-22 21:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi Enrico,
> >>>
> >>> You should use 'ubuntu' rather than 'Ubuntu' (it is case sensitive).
> It
> >>> is
> >>> running now -
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/1/console
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Thank you. I thought I had tried but without success.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Also It would be good to put code-coverage into
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-release-nightly-snapshot/
> >>> eventually.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will play and the integrate the two jobs
> >>
> >> Thank you very much
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Sijie
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I will check it tomorrow.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Aug 20, 2017 1:23 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Sijie,
> >>> >> I am not able to make the new job run
> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I cannot find any available node, I tried with ubumtu and haddop,
> with
> >>> >> different cases for the first char
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Ideas?
> >>> >> Enrico
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On sab 19 ago 2017, 15:35 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > I have created a new jenkins job
> >>> >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > emails will be sent to my address eolive...@apache.org
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > I am playing with cobertura, if I won't succeed I will create a PR
> >>> in
> >>> >> > order to introduce the configuration of JaCoCo on master branch
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Enrico
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > 2017-08-04 21:55 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> Sure go for it.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Sijie
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Aug 4, 2017 12:46 PM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> > Il gio 20 lug 2017, 17:06 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com
> >
> >>> ha
> >>> >> >> > scritto:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > > Jacoco is running as expected
> >>> >> >> > > see:
> >>> >> >> > > https://coveralls.io/jobs/27785961
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > > I think it is better to switch to Jacoco
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > > I wonder why on DL there is no such problem with Cobertura
> >>> >> >> > > @Sijie do you have any idea ?
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Other opinions? I am going to test codecov.io too in other
> >>> projects
> >>> >> and
> >>> >> >> > compare the results
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Enrico
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > > -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > > 2017-07-20 16:06 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> eolive...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >> I am sorry but it seems that cobertura is not working with
> >>> java8,
> >>> >> as
> >>> >> >> > >> reported in Coveralls.io homepage
> >>> >> >> > >> https://github.com/trautonen/coveralls-maven-plugin
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >> see our error:
> >>> >> >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-tests/6/console
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >> I will be back to Jacoco which seems to be the only one
> which
> >>> >> >> supports
> >>> >> >> > >> java8 for Coveralls
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >> -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >> 2017-07-19 18:02 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> Hmm he should mail you the token rather then posting on the
> >>> jira
> >>> >> :)
> >>> >> >> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> On Jul 19, 2017 8:56 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
> >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > We have the token, it is in the ticket.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > I will do some tests soon
> >>> >> >> > >>> > Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > Il mer 19 lug 2017, 17:52 Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> ha
> >>> >> >> > >>> > scritto:
> >>> >> >> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > > this is the INFRA ticket for having a coveralls.io
> >>> token in
> >>> >> our
> >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins
> >>> >> >> > >>> > > builds
> >>> >> >> > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14649
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > > -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > > 2017-07-17 23:49 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> >> eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> >:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Il lun 17 lug 2017, 22:55 Sijie Guo <
> guosi...@gmail.com
> >
> >>> ha
> >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Il lun 17 lug 2017, 21:34 Sijie Guo <
> >>> guosi...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> ha
> >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Enrico Olivelli
> <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > I have just committed coveralls.io and
> cobertura
> >>> >> >> plugins
> >>> >> >> > >>> into
> >>> >> >> > >>> > main
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > pom.xml
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > (as DistributedLog does)
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > The next step is to enable cobertura and tests
> in
> >>> >> >> Travis.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Currently we do not run tests on Travis because
> >>> it is
> >>> >> >> very
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> slow.....
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > any ideas ?
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > I believe you need a coveralls token for
> reporting
> >>> the
> >>> >> >> > coverage
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> results.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > Jenkins is probably better for this purpose
> >>> because the
> >>> >> >> token
> >>> >> >> > >>> has
> >>> >> >> > >>> > to
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> be
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > store secretly.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > In this doc it seems that using the coveralls
> plugin
> >>> >> inside
> >>> >> >> a
> >>> >> >> > >>> travis
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> build
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > does not require tokens
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/trautonen/
> >>> coveralls-maven-plugin/blob/
> >>> >> >> > >>> > master/README.md
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> I barely remembered that it doesn't actually work,
> but
> >>> I
> >>> >> >> might be
> >>> >> >> > >>> > wrong.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >> I just pinged infra, my email was not responded
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Meanwhile I am going to submit a PR with a
> >>> change in
> >>> >> >> Travis
> >>> >> >> > >>> > config
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> in
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > order
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > to test Cobertura speed on Travis
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > 2017-07-06 17:30 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > 2017-07-05 16:13 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> 2017-07-05 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
> >>> >> >> > guosi...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> > >>> >:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> It would be worth checking with the INFRA
> to
> >>> see
> >>> >> >> what
> >>> >> >> > >>> kind of
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> code
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coverage
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> that it provides. I remembered that a few
> ASF
> >>> >> >> projects
> >>> >> >> > >>> using
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coveralls.io,
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> INFRA can enable this for you and give you
> an
> >>> >> token
> >>> >> >> > >>> which you
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> can
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> configure
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> in the CI job. I think coveralls supports
> >>> JaCoco.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> I will sent and email to INFRA and come back
> >>> with
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> >> > >>> response
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > no answer from INFRA
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > meanwhile I was playing with coveralls.io
> and
> >>> I
> >>> >> found
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > >>> our
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> repo
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > is
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > somehow already configured, see
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://coveralls.io/github/
> apache/bookkeeper
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I don't know whoever did it
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > It seams that in order to have such service
> use
> >>> >> have
> >>> >> >> to
> >>> >> >> > >>> include
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > JaCoCo
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > maven plugin, then enable some automatic
> build
> >>> >> using
> >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins or
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Travis
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > and
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > then add another coveralls plugin
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > see this interesting document
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://github.com/
> >>> asciidoctor/asciidoctor/wiki/
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > Coveralls.io-configuration-
> for-maven-projects
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I think that the starting point is to
> integrate
> >>> >> JaCoco
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> Sijie
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> On Jul 5, 2017 1:57 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > I am attaching a report (I am using
> Google
> >>> >> Drive
> >>> >> >> as
> >>> >> >> > >>> most
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> email
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > clients
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> will
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > block attachments with html inside) .
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Just untar and play with your browser
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > 2017-07-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Dávid
> Szigecsán
> >>> <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > SonarCloud is free for open source.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > https://about.sonarcloud.io/
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Yes I known
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > recently we have activated Travis CI, I
> >>> think
> >>> >> that
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > >>> > trend
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> is
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > to
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > integrate with such free tools in order
> to
> >>> >> achieve
> >>> >> >> > the
> >>> >> >> > >>> best
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> with
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > the minimum effort
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > 2017-07-04 18:15 GMT+02:00 Enrico
> >>> Olivelli <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Il mar 4 lug 2017, 18:08 Dávid
> >>> Szigecsán <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > ha
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > scritto:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > +1
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > What do you think about sonar? :)
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> I am using sonar in projects in my
> >>> company,
> >>> >> it
> >>> >> >> is
> >>> >> >> > >>> great.
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> But it needs a server, so it is not
> >>> easy to
> >>> >> use
> >>> >> >> > for
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> everyone
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > 2017-07-04 17:24 GMT+02:00 Enrico
> >>> >> Olivelli <
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > eolive...@gmail.com
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >:
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > Hi all,
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > as we are in the mood of enhancing
> >>> >> >> automatic
> >>> >> >> > QA
> >>> >> >> > >>> and
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > of
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > BookKeeper I have created this
> >>> issue in
> >>> >> >> order
> >>> >> >> > to
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> introduce
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> JaCoCo in
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > the build/test pipeline
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/
> >>> >> >> > bookkeeper/issues/232
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > I will do some tests and report to
> >>> the
> >>> >> >> > comunity
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > -- Enrico
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> --
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >  bookkeeper-server-jacoco.tar.gz
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > <https://drive.google.com/
> >>> file/d/0Bz7lsWhNTGF-
> >>> >> >> > >>> > OVZFblRpZE00Nz
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> A/view?usp=
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > drive_web>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > --
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >> --
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>> > >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > > --
> >>> >> >> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >> >> > >>> >
> >>> >> >> > >>>
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > >>
> >>> >> >> > > --
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > --
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >> --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>

Reply via email to