I have updated master job
https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-master/

let's see the results
-- Enrico

2017-08-24 10:27 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:

> It seems that JaCoCo works like a charm
> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/3/console
> https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper
>
> I will integrate it into nightly builds, the only concern is that
> CodeCoverage instrumentation may affect tests
> thoughts ?
>
> -- Enrico
>
>
>
> 2017-08-24 2:09 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com>:
>
>> 👍
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > 2017-08-23 17:34 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > On Aug 23, 2017 7:31 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 2017-08-23 8:29 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > Latest news
>> > > >
>> > > > The build works and coveralls reports a 63% code coverage.
>> > > > Maybe the link to the badge on readme.md is wrong, I will check
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Our core in README.md is good, but github caches images, this is the
>> good
>> > > link but GitHub cached an old version of the image
>> > > https://coveralls.io/repos/github/apache/bookkeeper/
>> > > badge.svg?branch=master
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Cobertura reports a lot of parsing errors, I will continue to try
>> > JaCoCo
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > I have tried with JaCoCo the result is similar, but there are no
>> "scary"
>> > > message on console output like this:
>> > >
>> > > net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.ParseException: Encountered
>> > > " "default" "default "" at line 332, column 5.
>> > > Was expecting one of:
>> > >     "abstract" ...
>> > >     "boolean" ...
>> > >     "byte" ...
>> > >     "char" ...
>> > >     "class" ...
>> > >     "double" ...
>> > >     "enum" ...
>> > >     "final" ...
>> > >     "float" ...
>> > >     "int" ...
>> > >     "interface" ...
>> > >     "long" ...
>> > >     "native" ...
>> > >     "private" ...
>> > >     "protected" ...
>> > >     "public" ...
>> > >     "short" ...
>> > >     "static" ...
>> > >     "strictfp" ...
>> > >     "synchronized" ...
>> > >     "transient" ...
>> > >     "void" ...
>> > >     "volatile" ...
>> > >     <IDENTIFIER> ...
>> > >     "}" ...
>> > >     ";" ...
>> > >     "@" ...
>> > >     "<" ...
>> > >
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>> > > generateParseException(JavaParser.java:10490)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.jj_
>> > > consume_token(JavaParser.java:10366)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>> > > UnmodifiedInterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1475)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>> > > InterfaceDeclaration(JavaParser.java:1273)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>> > > TypeDeclaration(JavaParser.java:580)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>> > > CompilationUnit(JavaParser.java:318)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.parser.JavaParser.
>> > > parse(JavaParser.java:100)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
>> > > measureSource(Javancss.java:192)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss._
>> > > measureRoot(Javancss.java:268)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.Javancss.<init>(
>> > > Javancss.java:347)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.javancss.JavancssFactory.
>> > > newInstance(JavancssFactory.java:40)
>> > >         at net.sourceforge.cobertura.reporting.ComplexityCalculator.
>> > > getFunctionMetricsForSingleFile(ComplexityCalculator.java:243)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Maybe it is better to switch to JaCoCo, Cobertura wants to read java
>> code
>> > > but cannot handle Java8 default methods interface syntax
>> > >
>> > > Issue:
>> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/464
>> > >
>> > > Patch to introduce the configuration:
>> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/465
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Good job! I made one comment in the pull request. Otherwise, overall
>> > looks
>> > > good.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Once we have a stable code coverage tool I would like to setup an
>> > automatic
>> > > check upon Pull Requests
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Sure, are you planning to enforce pull request should increase
>> coverage?
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > It would be great
>> > but I think it is not really possible, sometimes we have patches on the
>> > website or on poms
>> > I have to understand better how code coverage tools work
>> > for instance I see that interfaces code seems to be "uncovered" so
>> > introducing a new interface will decrease the coverage
>> > I have to play with it
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts ?
>> > >
>> > > Enrico
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I will try on DL to in case we have to switch
>> > > >
>> > > > Enrico
>> > > >
>> > > > On mar 22 ago 2017, 22:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> 2017-08-22 21:52 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Hi Enrico,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> You should use 'ubuntu' rather than 'Ubuntu' (it is case
>> sensitive).
>> > > It
>> > > >>> is
>> > > >>> running now -
>> > > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/1/console
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> Thank you. I thought I had tried but without success.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> Also It would be good to put code-coverage into
>> > > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-release-nightly-sna
>> pshot/
>> > > >>> eventually.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I will play and the integrate the two jobs
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thank you very much
>> > > >> Enrico
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> - Sijie
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> > I will check it tomorrow.
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> > On Aug 20, 2017 1:23 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> Sijie,
>> > > >>> >> I am not able to make the new job run
>> > > >>> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> I cannot find any available node, I tried with ubumtu and
>> haddop,
>> > > with
>> > > >>> >> different cases for the first char
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> Ideas?
>> > > >>> >> Enrico
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> On sab 19 ago 2017, 15:35 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> > I have created a new jenkins job
>> > > >>> >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-codecoverage/
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > emails will be sent to my address eolive...@apache.org
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > I am playing with cobertura, if I won't succeed I will
>> create a
>> > PR
>> > > >>> in
>> > > >>> >> > order to introduce the configuration of JaCoCo on master
>> branch
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > 2017-08-04 21:55 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>:
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> Sure go for it.
>> > > >>> >> >>
>> > > >>> >> >> Sijie
>> > > >>> >> >>
>> > > >>> >> >> On Aug 4, 2017 12:46 PM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
>> > eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >> wrote:
>> > > >>> >> >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > Il gio 20 lug 2017, 17:06 Enrico Olivelli <
>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >>> ha
>> > > >>> >> >> > scritto:
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > > Jacoco is running as expected
>> > > >>> >> >> > > see:
>> > > >>> >> >> > > https://coveralls.io/jobs/27785961
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > > I think it is better to switch to Jacoco
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > > I wonder why on DL there is no such problem with
>> Cobertura
>> > > >>> >> >> > > @Sijie do you have any idea ?
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > Other opinions? I am going to test codecov.io too in
>> other
>> > > >>> projects
>> > > >>> >> and
>> > > >>> >> >> > compare the results
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > > -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > > 2017-07-20 16:06 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> I am sorry but it seems that cobertura is not working
>> with
>> > > >>> java8,
>> > > >>> >> as
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> reported in Coveralls.io homepage
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> https://github.com/trautonen/coveralls-maven-plugin
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> see our error:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/
>> bookkeeper-tests/6/console
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> I will be back to Jacoco which seems to be the only one
>> > > which
>> > > >>> >> >> supports
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> java8 for Coveralls
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >> 2017-07-19 18:02 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
>> guosi...@gmail.com
>> > >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Hmm he should mail you the token rather then posting
>> on
>> > the
>> > > >>> jira
>> > > >>> >> :)
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> On Jul 19, 2017 8:56 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <
>> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >> >> > wrote:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > We have the token, it is in the ticket.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > I will do some tests soon
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > Il mer 19 lug 2017, 17:52 Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> ha
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > scritto:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > this is the INFRA ticket for having a
>> coveralls.io
>> > > >>> token in
>> > > >>> >> our
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > builds
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14649
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > 2017-07-17 23:49 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > >>> >> eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Il lun 17 lug 2017, 22:55 Sijie Guo <
>> > > guosi...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >>> ha
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Enrico
>> Olivelli <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Il lun 17 lug 2017, 21:34 Sijie Guo <
>> > > >>> guosi...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >> ha
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> scritto:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Enrico
>> > Olivelli
>> > > <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > I have just committed coveralls.io and
>> > > cobertura
>> > > >>> >> >> plugins
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> into
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > main
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > pom.xml
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > (as DistributedLog does)
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > The next step is to enable cobertura and
>> > tests
>> > > in
>> > > >>> >> >> Travis.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Currently we do not run tests on Travis
>> > because
>> > > >>> it is
>> > > >>> >> >> very
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> slow.....
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > any ideas ?
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > I believe you need a coveralls token for
>> > > reporting
>> > > >>> the
>> > > >>> >> >> > coverage
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> results.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > Jenkins is probably better for this purpose
>> > > >>> because the
>> > > >>> >> >> token
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> has
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > to
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> be
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > store secretly.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > In this doc it seems that using the coveralls
>> > > plugin
>> > > >>> >> inside
>> > > >>> >> >> a
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> travis
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> build
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > does not require tokens
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/trautonen/
>> > > >>> coveralls-maven-plugin/blob/
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > master/README.md
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> I barely remembered that it doesn't actually
>> work,
>> > > but
>> > > >>> I
>> > > >>> >> >> might be
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > wrong.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> I just pinged infra, my email was not responded
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > Meanwhile I am going to submit a PR with a
>> > > >>> change in
>> > > >>> >> >> Travis
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > config
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> in
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > order
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > to test Cobertura speed on Travis
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > 2017-07-06 17:30 GMT+02:00 Enrico
>> Olivelli <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > 2017-07-05 16:13 GMT+02:00 Enrico
>> Olivelli
>> > <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> 2017-07-05 16:05 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <
>> > > >>> >> >> > guosi...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> It would be worth checking with the
>> INFRA
>> > > to
>> > > >>> see
>> > > >>> >> >> what
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> kind of
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> code
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coverage
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> that it provides. I remembered that a
>> few
>> > > ASF
>> > > >>> >> >> projects
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> using
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> coveralls.io,
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> INFRA can enable this for you and give
>> > you
>> > > an
>> > > >>> >> token
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> which you
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> can
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> configure
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> in the CI job. I think coveralls
>> supports
>> > > >>> JaCoco.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> I will sent and email to INFRA and come
>> > back
>> > > >>> with
>> > > >>> >> the
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> response
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > no answer from INFRA
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > meanwhile I was playing with
>> coveralls.io
>> > > and
>> > > >>> I
>> > > >>> >> found
>> > > >>> >> >> > the
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> our
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> repo
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > is
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > somehow already configured, see
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://coveralls.io/github/
>> > > apache/bookkeeper
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I don't know whoever did it
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > It seams that in order to have such
>> service
>> > > use
>> > > >>> >> have
>> > > >>> >> >> to
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> include
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > JaCoCo
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > maven plugin, then enable some automatic
>> > > build
>> > > >>> >> using
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> Jenkins or
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > Travis
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > and
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > then add another coveralls plugin
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > see this interesting document
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > https://github.com/
>> > > >>> asciidoctor/asciidoctor/wiki/
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > Coveralls.io-configuration-
>> > > for-maven-projects
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > I think that the starting point is to
>> > > integrate
>> > > >>> >> JaCoco
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > > -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >> -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> Sijie
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> On Jul 5, 2017 1:57 AM, "Enrico
>> > Olivelli" <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > I am attaching a report (I am using
>> > > Google
>> > > >>> >> Drive
>> > > >>> >> >> as
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> most
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> email
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > clients
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> will
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > block attachments with html inside)
>> .
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Just untar and play with your
>> browser
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > 2017-07-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Dávid
>> > > Szigecsán
>> > > >>> <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > SonarCloud is free for open
>> source.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > https://about.sonarcloud.io/
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > Yes I known
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > recently we have activated Travis
>> CI, I
>> > > >>> think
>> > > >>> >> that
>> > > >>> >> >> > the
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > trend
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> is
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > to
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > integrate with such free tools in
>> order
>> > > to
>> > > >>> >> achieve
>> > > >>> >> >> > the
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> best
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> with
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > the minimum effort
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > > 2017-07-04 18:15 GMT+02:00 Enrico
>> > > >>> Olivelli <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Il mar 4 lug 2017, 18:08 Dávid
>> > > >>> Szigecsán <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> sige...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > ha
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > scritto:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > +1
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > What do you think about sonar?
>> :)
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> I am using sonar in projects in
>> my
>> > > >>> company,
>> > > >>> >> it
>> > > >>> >> >> is
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> great.
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> But it needs a server, so it is
>> not
>> > > >>> easy to
>> > > >>> >> use
>> > > >>> >> >> > for
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> everyone
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > 2017-07-04 17:24 GMT+02:00
>> Enrico
>> > > >>> >> Olivelli <
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > eolive...@gmail.com
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >:
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > Hi all,
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > as we are in the mood of
>> > enhancing
>> > > >>> >> >> automatic
>> > > >>> >> >> > QA
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> and
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > quality
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > of
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > BookKeeper I have created
>> this
>> > > >>> issue in
>> > > >>> >> >> order
>> > > >>> >> >> > to
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> introduce
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> JaCoCo in
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > the build/test pipeline
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > https://github.com/apache/
>> > > >>> >> >> > bookkeeper/issues/232
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > I will do some tests and
>> report
>> > to
>> > > >>> the
>> > > >>> >> >> > comunity
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > > -- Enrico
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> --
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >  bookkeeper-server-jacoco.tar.gz
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > <https://drive.google.com/
>> > > >>> file/d/0Bz7lsWhNTGF-
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > OVZFblRpZE00Nz
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> A/view?usp=
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > drive_web>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> > ​
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > --
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> --
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > > --
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > >>
>> > > >>> >> >> > > --
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >>> >> >> >
>> > > >>> >> >>
>> > > >>> >> >
>> > > >>> >> > --
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >>> >>
>> > > >>> >
>> > > >>>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to