On 7/8/2015 7:31 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
If somebody is willing to do the formatting, I'm willing to do the review. I think the thread has reached the point of people repeating ad nauseum what was already said earlier in the thread, so it's time for a decision. Benjamin?

Aww, I was avoiding getting into this thread.

I personally have no strong preference, and our existing community is pretty deeply divided. I doubt we're going to come to consensus here, and this is a pretty tough decision to make on its own. I do believe that consistency trumps module/personal preference in terms of coding style.

The argument I am most sympathetic to is that this convention is a barrier to new contributors. Making new contributors productive, both employees and volunteers, is a very good reason to choose one style over another.

Given that premise, we shouldn't just change aArgument; we should adopt the Google C++ style guide wholesale:

* names_with_underscores
* members_with_trailing_
* no more ns prefix

There is good research that underscore_names are more readable, and many of these will be more familiar to new contributors. Also we have a fair bit of shared code with Google.

If there is a decision to be made here, I'd like to make this RFC:

* switch our codebase wholesale to the Google C++ style guide

With the following implementation plan:

* For now, code should continue to be written in the current style with aFoo, mFoo, and camelCase.
* get our code -Wshadow clean
* Ask poiru to investigate auto-renaming of our variables including mFoo, aFoo, and camelCase to the google-standard local variable names. * Do not make any changes to the style guide or standard practice until we're comfortable that we can do automatic changes. * Make the automatic changes and change our style guide at roughly the same time.
* Go back and deal with class names (nsFoo) as a separate/later pass.

--BDS

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to