On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Bobby Holley <bobbyhol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Eric Rahm <er...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > I'm not a huge fan of the 'aFoo' style, but I am a huge fan of > > consistency. So if we want to change the style guide we should update our > > codebase, and I don't think we can reasonably do that automatically > without > > introducing shadowing issues. > > > > This a great point, and perhaps the most useful one to be raised in this > thread. > > The priority is to automatically rewrite our source with a unified style. > foo -> aFoo is reasonably safe, whereas aFoo->foo is not, at least with the > current tools. So we either need to combine the rewrite tools with static > analysis, or just go with aFoo. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > +1 for consistency. Any volunteers who is willing to get rid of aFoo EVERYWHERE and someone else who is willing to review that work? If not then we should do it the other way around. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
