Hi,

On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 18:42 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 21.06.24 17:37, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> > I also wrote:
> > 
> > > (Please also consider in your reply the suggested changes to make
> > > hashing possible/easier...)
> > 
> > Did you consider that in your new analysis? If yes, how?
> 
> No,

Thanks for that confirmation.

> but I just checked: among the newest 25 packages in browse.dgit.d.o, 
> 16 contain a d/patches directory and would thus (presumably) be not 
> eligible for creating the hash locally.

I don't see why that would be the case in general...

Ansgar


Reply via email to