Hi, On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 17:24 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > On 21.06.24 16:57, Ansgar 🙀 wrote: > > So your suggested method of measurement and the resulting 80% seem > > very > > questionable and only usable as a very generous upper boundary. > > You're right but AFAICT this can only happen when the two tags are > consecutive, I spot-checked a couple of them to verify this. > > Excluding packages where this is the case drops the count to … 39. > Plus > 26 for another 50. > > Thus, not *that* generous.
I also wrote: | (Please also consider in your reply the suggested changes to make | hashing possible/easier...) Did you consider that in your new analysis? If yes, how? Ansgar
