Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> writes: > This whole thread is about a draft GR to override a FTP Master decision > based on a claim that they had refused to engage with the tag2upload > developers for years to explain their concerns or work on resolving > them.
> None of that turned out to be accurate. tag2upload is still being blocked by the FTP team so far as I can tell (I don't understand if Joerg's last message changes this), and a GR is still the only way to unblock that work that I can see. It is true that we have now finally had the discussion, with actual engagement, that we needed to have. (And this is exactly why I am so in favor of draft GRs for controversial proposals. That final check is often so incredibly useful at uncovering communication problems and getting discussions to happen.) But so far, this has not resolved the problem that one team's work is being blocked by a delegate decision with no obvious path forward that achieves their goals. Maybe we will still be able to resolve this: for a brief moment, it looked like there was some movement, and then Ansgar walked it back. But I'm still willing to talk about that (and also because Joerg asked to keep talking about it for a bit longer). As things currently stand, though, a GR is still the only path forward. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>