On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:03:43PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:11:40PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:34:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > We made a promise to users; and even called it a > > > ``contract''. Now we no longer want to keep that promise, so are we > > > going to just leave the users in the lurch, with no transition plan, > > > no support going forward? For people whoi seem to think that > > > distributing non-DFSG free software is unethical, how ethicsal is > > > this reneging on our promise? > > > > I'm not going to respond to that, other than to point out that it > > is based on the assumption that non-free is important and useful. > > Prove that it isn't.
Why? I figure people can make up their own minds without my help. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
