On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:01:43AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Jan 5, 2004, at 22:03, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >> > >>I'm not going to respond to that, other than to point out that it > >>is based on the assumption that non-free is important and useful. > > > >Prove that it isn't. > > It is the duty of the proponent to prove his arguments and demonstrate > his assumptions.
You (and Andrew Suffield, John Goerzen etc) are advocating the removal of non-free, so I believe the burden of proof is yours. If you want to change the status quo, convince the voters. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
