On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:11:40PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:34:41PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > We made a promise to users; and even called it a > > ``contract''. Now we no longer want to keep that promise, so are we > > going to just leave the users in the lurch, with no transition plan, > > no support going forward? For people whoi seem to think that > > distributing non-DFSG free software is unethical, how ethicsal is > > this reneging on our promise? > > I'm not going to respond to that, other than to point out that it > is based on the assumption that non-free is important and useful.
Prove that it isn't. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
