On Monday 19 October 2015 16:35:03 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:39:13AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 19 October 2015 07:57:30 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > Yes, I'm aware of all that. And I never said the CoC is wrong or should > > > be changed. I'm just advocating for dealing with those who fail this > > > CoC (especially this little technical item) more gracefully. That's > > > all. > > > > Hallelujah! Thank you, tomas. That went to the list only, with nary a > > sign of a copy to Brian. > > Well, that's embarrasing. Turns out I had a mistake in my setup. > > I owe you a $BEVERAGE of your choice (whithin reasonable bounds ;-) -- so > if you run into me in one of the usual conferences, go ahead!
Thank you! I accept. Fortunately for you, and sadly for me, I'm not allowed by my doctors to drink Chateau d'Yquem, so I shall have to toast you in fizzy mineral water. > Believe me or not -- it was never my intention to troll. I do believe you! Though how on earth you managed to sit through what we were saying, and especially what I was saying off list, without checking your headers or settings, does somewhat bemuse me. :-/ The trouble is, I know what I mean to type, so that is what I see. Presumably you knew what your settings were supposed to be, so that is what you saw. > Hanlon's razor[1] > applies. > > [1] "Never attribute to malice what can appropriately be explained by > stupidity" The older I get, the truer I see that that is. I apologise for misspelling your name. That is something I try to be meticulous about, but I had never till now noticed the accent. Though I had noticed that you do not use an initial capital. Lisi
