On Monday 19 October 2015 08:28:16 Joe wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:47:02 +1300 > > Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:21:49PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > tomas said: > > > > Yes, you are right about the CoC part. Still, if someone is picky > > > > about *not* being cc'ed, I'd consider it polite to at least do > > > > his/her part and express this wish with the headers in use for > > > > this purpose. At least *before* scolding others <:*) > > > > > > Don't take me wrong. I think its reasonable. But I think also we > > > should try to be gentle about it (and try to "fix" as much as > > > possible on our sides). > > > > So you're saying that someone who is following the code should go out > > of their way to accomodate the ones who won't follow the code? > > A little way, not too far. > > It's not really a matter of getting one more unsolicited email in > this day and age, the point of this kind of list is to stand as an > archive, so that the various answers to the questions, and just as > importantly, the wanderings down the byways, remain to help others in > the future.
Quite. And that will only work if people reply to list and do not break the threads. Lisi
