On Monday 19 October 2015 07:47:53 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:47:02PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:21:49PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > tomas said: > > > > Yes, you are right about the CoC part. Still, if someone is picky > > > > about *not* being cc'ed, I'd consider it polite to at least do > > > > his/her part and express this wish with the headers in use for this > > > > purpose. At least *before* scolding others <:*) > > [...] > > > So you're saying that someone who is following the code should go out > > of their way to accomodate the ones who won't follow the code? > > *sigh* > > I give up. Do whatever you want.
Of course Chris will do what he wants, and not what you want. Why should he do anything else? But you are *still* not following the code. You have addressed that to Chris with a cc to the list. You seem to think that you should dictate how the list behaves and that the CoC is an aberration that OUGHT to be ignored. As I said to you, "you are sending them (these double copies) deliberately, and being a nuisance deliberately. Another word for that is trolling." Lisi
