-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:39:13AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 19 October 2015 07:57:30 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Yes, I'm aware of all that. And I never said the CoC is wrong or should
> > be changed. I'm just advocating for dealing with those who fail this
> > CoC (especially this little technical item) more gracefully. That's all.
>
> Hallelujah! Thank you, tomas. That went to the list only, with nary a sign
> of a copy to Brian.
Well, that's embarrasing. Turns out I had a mistake in my setup.
I owe you a $BEVERAGE of your choice (whithin reasonable bounds ;-) -- so
if you run into me in one of the usual conferences, go ahead!
Believe me or not -- it was never my intention to troll. Hanlon's razor[1]
applies.
[1] "Never attribute to malice what can appropriately be explained by
stupidity"
Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlYlDacACgkQBcgs9XrR2kY2wACfQEW4VB/TJhhn352KnlNWHPyZ
b+kAn1GjEDCP8wCJ2L2vTUhDB7nNixLE
=V4re
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
