On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 13:12:26 +0200 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: > > > Le 08.07.2014 00:46, Andrei POPESCU a écrit : > > On Lu, 07 iul 14, 23:41:59, Miroslav Hrabal wrote:
> > If you find a way to solve this by using only traditional Unix > > groups I'm sure a lot of people would like to know how. > > I can't, but I want to ask some questions about that problem you > describe. > Are remote desktop the majority of linux uses? > Do you really need remote capabilities when you use your own computer? > What is the need of remote desktops on servers which are not > dedicated? > > In short, is it smart to give a dependency to everyone for something > which seems really addressing a problem for a minority? Especially > when it makes that much noise? > > Indeed, it's nice to have a software able to solve those issues. But, > why not only making it a opt-in, instead of opt-out? > Because of the major DEs? Seriously, I think they are wrong since the > day I definitely switched on linux, from windows, because windows'DE > tries to do too much, and so takes a lot more resources that it > really should. But... > I am not trying to impose my opinion and my uses to everyone (ok, to > be honest, when I can convince someone to use i3, I try hehe. But I > will never ask for the removal of gnome as the default Debian's DE.). For what it's worth, Berenger.morel, I agree with you. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140708162430.3acd3...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
