On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 06:51:11 +0100 Balint Szigeti <balint.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 13:12 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org > wrote: > > I can't, but I want to ask some questions about that problem you > > describe. > > Are remote desktop the majority of linux uses? > > Do you really need remote capabilities when you use your own > > computer? What is the need of remote desktops on servers which are > > not dedicated? > > exactly. why does Linux want to be a Windows DE? > (multi-graph-sessions)? because someone calls 'it is a modern system'? > usually, if one system is used by several people, that is a server and > the servers (if its admin learnt a little) doesn't have GUI because > it's not necessary. A bizarre thought just popped into my head, in the form of a little voice. The little voice told me that if they guys who controlled the decision to go to systemd had been the decision makers in 1990, Linux would have a microkernel today. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140711122157.4b696...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
