On 10/14/2010 12:01 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Mehdi, > > I have prepared an file and hopefully Jaldhar will upload it into > unstable and we can proceed from there. For your benefit I include > the diff. Most of it is of course the Creative Commons license. >
The mentioned changes look ok. But, I noticed that there were several files deleted from the source tarball. I realize that 0.1 contained some cruft and 0.1+nmu1 fixed that (which is a good thing). If you have several orig tarballs, you should use the source format 3.0 for this package (not during the freeze of cours :p or in experimental if you want) and I don't understand yet why it's a native package. Besides, I'm curious why the maintainer sponsored an NMU of his own package? … unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc0abd7.6030...@dogguy.org
