On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into > squeeze. I can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time > ago. > > The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd > layout and so needed to be repacked to build correctly.
Yeah. I do know that (I checked before answering). It will be the first time Debian will release with l-a-e-p-b-perl. So, missing a module in the first release can't considered a regression. That's why, *I* don't consider it as RC. Other people might have a different opinion though. > If we produce a 0.1.1 that ONLY updates the copyright for the icons > and does the repacking for ProtectCSF could we get that into > squeeze? Of course such a 0.1.1 would not have updated standards > versions or updated copyright format etc. Yes. > As such simply downgrading #599794 to something less serious and > waiting for the freeze to lift is attractive if that is an option. > No, that's still not an option. We could tag it squeeze-ignore if we don't grant a freeze-exception for it, but the issue remains serious. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cb5813a.1050...@dogguy.org
