Mehdi,
Please could we have some progress on this. Sadly I am aware of
another copyright issue (and probably another if I dared looking) but I
will only handle one at a time.
Nicholas
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
We now have a 0.1+nmu1 . Please could this now be granted an
exception to go into testing after the appropriate period of delay.
Thanks.
Nicholas
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Okay I will produce a 0.1-1. I just realized that I had no
involvement in 0.1 and so I could not make it a 0.1.1. Of course
Jaldhar will still have his say but I cannot see why he should object.
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into
squeeze. I can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time
ago.
The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd
layout and so needed to be repacked to build correctly.
Yeah. I do know that (I checked before answering). It will be the first
time Debian will release with l-a-e-p-b-perl. So, missing a module in
the first release can't considered a regression. That's why, *I* don't
consider it as RC. Other people might have a different opinion though.
If we produce a 0.1.1 that ONLY updates the copyright for the icons
and does the repacking for ProtectCSF could we get that into
squeeze? Of course such a 0.1.1 would not have updated standards
versions or updated copyright format etc.
Yes.
As such simply downgrading #599794 to something less serious and
waiting for the freeze to lift is attractive if that is an option.
No, that's still not an option. We could tag it squeeze-ignore if we
don't grant a freeze-exception for it, but the issue remains serious.
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cbf1f45.7040...@periapt.co.uk
