Re: Advance freeze exception request for libcgi-application-extra-plugin-bundle-perl

[Nicholas Bamber]

Okay I will produce a 0.1-1. I just realized that I had no involvement 
in 0.1 and so  I could not make it a 0.1.1. Of course Jaldhar will still 
have his say but I cannot see why he should object.

Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
  
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into 
squeeze. I can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time
 ago.
The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd 
layout and so needed to be repacked to build correctly.
    

Yeah. I do know that (I checked before answering). It will be the first
time Debian will release with l-a-e-p-b-perl. So, missing a module in
the first release can't considered a regression. That's why, *I* don't
consider it as RC. Other people might have a different opinion though.

  
If we produce a 0.1.1 that ONLY updates  the copyright for the icons
 and does the repacking for ProtectCSF could we get that into
squeeze? Of course such a 0.1.1 would not have updated standards
versions or updated copyright format etc.
    

Yes.

  
As such simply downgrading #599794 to something less serious and 
waiting for the freeze to lift is attractive if that is an option.

    

No, that's still not an option. We could tag it squeeze-ignore if we
don't grant a freeze-exception for it, but the issue remains serious.

Regards,

  

<<attachment: nicholas.vcf>>