debian-project  

Messages by Thread

• A problem with identification Christian Surchi
  • Re: A problem with identification Shane Wegner
  • Re: A problem with identification Christian Surchi
  • RE: A problem with identification Jim Westveer
  • Re: A problem with identification Christian Surchi
  • Re: A problem with identification Craig Small
  • Re: A problem with identification Christian Surchi
• Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Julian Gilbey
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Christian Surchi
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Gerfried Fuchs
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Christian Surchi
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Julian Gilbey
• Re: The Debian New Maintainer process Taketoshi Sano
• packaging suggestions for applicant michael d. ivey
• Re: Update on "New Maintainers Corner" web page Taketoshi Sano
• [e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)] Julian Gilbey
  • Re: key signing coordination page [e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)] Taketoshi Sano
• Where to send NM reports? Clay Crouch
  • RE: Where to send NM reports? Jim Westveer
  • Re: Where to send NM reports? Julian Gilbey
  • Re: Where to send NM reports? Craig Small
  • Re: Where to send NM reports? Julian Gilbey
• AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Julian Gilbey
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Mike Mattice
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Craig Small
  • Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
  • gnupg 1.0.1 <-> gnupg 1.0.2 problem? (Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter) Fumitoshi UKAI
• Query on requirements for identification John O Sullivan
  • RE: Query on requirements for identification Jim Westveer
  • Re: Query on requirements for identification Julian Gilbey
• Translation skills H. S. Teoh
  • Re: Translation skills Craig Small
• Agreeing with philosophies/procedures H. S. Teoh
  • Re: Agreeing with philosophies/procedures Craig Small
• gpg key question (first applicant) Guillaume Morin
  • Re: gpg key question (first applicant) Bolan Meek
  • Re: gpg key question (first applicant) Guillaume Morin
• NM website changes Craig Small
• New developers -> new AMs Julian Gilbey
• Re: ITP enhydra Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: ITP enhydra John Leuner
  • Re: ITP enhydra Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: ITP enhydra John Leuner
• Woody ISOs Kyle Lynch
  • Re: Woody ISOs Remco van de Meent
  • Re: Woody ISOs Santiago Garcia Mantinan
• nm-admin/nm-discuss@cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de superseded Lars Steinke
  • Re: nm-admin/nm-discuss@cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de superseded Taketoshi Sano
• Re: Identification step in the current scheme C.M. Connelly
• Bug#70121: automatic build fails for potato Dirk Eddelbuettel
  • Re: Bug#70121: automatic build fails for potato Colin Watson
• Potato cd cover art ? Philippe Troin
  • Re: Potato cd cover art ? Martin Schulze
• Debian presentation to GOLUM Chris Lawrence
• vger.rutgers.edu & lmkl down ? Philippe Troin
  • Re: vger.rutgers.edu & lmkl down ? Remco van de Meent
• It spreads by casual contact... Seth Cohn
  • Re: It spreads by casual contact... goswin . brederlow
• ALS (October 10-14) Chris Lawrence
  • Re: ALS (October 10-14) Martin Schulze
• Oops: _not_ a debian derived system - NIC (www.thinknic.com) Seth Cohn
• Another debian derived system - NIC (www.thinknic.com) Seth Cohn
• Debian JP applicants Drake Diedrich
  • Re: [nm-admin] Debian JP applicants Fumitoshi UKAI
• Gibraltar project: first pre-release Rene Mayrhofer
• Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Jason Gunthorpe
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Jérôme Marant
  • Priority for Sponsored (was Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Bolan Meek
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Dirk Eddelbuettel
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Jason Gunthorpe
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Brian Mays
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Brian Mays
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Stephane Bortzmeyer
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Joey Hess
• Req Fer Code: Mirrors list checker tool Jason Gunthorpe
  • Re: Req Fer Code: Mirrors list checker tool Fabien Ninoles
  • Re: Req Fer Code: Mirrors list checker tool Dirk Eddelbuettel
• Please reply soon, or I could not proceed (Re: how to be a rudebastard?) Taketoshi Sano
  • Thanks for your information (Re: Please reply soon, or I could notproceed) Taketoshi Sano
  • Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Joop Stakenborg
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Christian Surchi
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Stephen R. Gore
  • Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
  • Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Taketoshi Sano
  • RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Jim Westveer
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Peter Palfrader
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Jim Westveer
  • RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) An Thi-Nguyen Le
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Oliver Elphick
  • Photo ID (was Re: [nm-admin] Identification step ...) Bolan Meek
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Detlev Zundel
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Detlev Zundel
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Scanned Photos Req'd (was Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current... scheme ) Bolan Meek
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Peter Palfrader
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Jim Westveer
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Shane Wegner
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Branden Robinson
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Oliver M . Bolzer
  • Note on photo-ID (Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme) Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anthony Towns
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Clay Crouch
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Branden Robinson
  • Need for scanner to become a maintainer? goswin . brederlow
  • Re: Need for scanner to become a maintainer? Anand Kumria
  • [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? goswin . brederlow
  • Re: [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? Matthew Vernon
  • Re: [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? clemensF
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Wichert Akkerman
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Steve Greenland
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Detlev Zundel
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme Seth Cohn
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Nils Lohner
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Taketoshi Sano
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Richard Braakman
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Chris Pimlott
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Nils Lohner
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Nils Lohner
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Chris Pimlott
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Chris Pimlott
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Andreas Rottmann
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCller?=
  • Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]